- last post: 01.01.0001 12:00 AM PDT
Posted by: Sketto
Posted by: Death v2
That is what it means to you personally, but for others that definition might be different, to me a list can have a low usage and not require removal. When I saw the last stats i thought THC, TSK, etc. were low usage, and they werent removed.
He in effect did remove RP ranked... anyways, thats your personal opinion and your personal wants.
To see how things would work, focus discussions, allow for new ideas, etc.
Low usage means low usage. Just because you think Low usage doesn't warrant a playlist to be removed doesn't make the definition of low usage ambiguous. No playlists were even removed so Sketchfactor did not go against your beliefs. He didn't removed "rumble pit ranked" that's not even a playlist. Making a playlist unranked isn't the same as removing it.
Give us a number value for where low usage starts than... also, he removed rumble pit, and kept rumble training...
Usage Stats don't allow for new ideas. What's stopping people from coming up with ideas? Numbers? Seeing how MM works isn't important. You make usage stats seem like they will solve all of matchmaking's problemsWell, if everyone sees that TSK is failing then they will attempt to improve that list. Ive said numerous times, pointing out problems, giving usage stats, etc. serve as a way to focus discussion and make things more on point.
[Edited on 05.04.2007 5:12 PM PDT]