Bungie.net Community
This topic has moved here: Subject: As community guy, and now incharge of MM should sketch post more of...
  • Subject: As community guy, and now incharge of MM should sketch post more of...
Subject: As community guy, and now incharge of MM should sketch post more of...
  • gamertag:
  • user homepage:
  • last post: 01.01.0001 12:00 AM PDT

Posted by: Sketto
Posted by: Death v2
That is what it means to you personally, but for others that definition might be different, to me a list can have a low usage and not require removal. When I saw the last stats i thought THC, TSK, etc. were low usage, and they werent removed.


He in effect did remove RP ranked... anyways, thats your personal opinion and your personal wants.

To see how things would work, focus discussions, allow for new ideas, etc.


Low usage means low usage. Just because you think Low usage doesn't warrant a playlist to be removed doesn't make the definition of low usage ambiguous. No playlists were even removed so Sketchfactor did not go against your beliefs. He didn't removed "rumble pit ranked" that's not even a playlist. Making a playlist unranked isn't the same as removing it.

Give us a number value for where low usage starts than... also, he removed rumble pit, and kept rumble training...


Usage Stats don't allow for new ideas. What's stopping people from coming up with ideas? Numbers? Seeing how MM works isn't important. You make usage stats seem like they will solve all of matchmaking's problems
Well, if everyone sees that TSK is failing then they will attempt to improve that list. Ive said numerous times, pointing out problems, giving usage stats, etc. serve as a way to focus discussion and make things more on point.

[Edited on 05.04.2007 5:12 PM PDT]

  • 05.04.2007 5:11 PM PDT
  • gamertag:
  • user homepage:
  • last post: 01.01.0001 12:00 AM PDT

Posted by: shiv master
Posted by: Death v2
Actually it is a fact that usage stats are very benificial to playlist discussions, the goal of the optimatch forum


Quite. I agree that such figures are beneficial to Bungie personnel.
The issue is why, and even if, the bnet community should be privy to these statistics.
There just isn't any reason other than "it would be nice".


Is it unreasonable to ask for a simple copy and paste job by sketch, or anyone else with access to those statistics?

  • 05.04.2007 5:11 PM PDT
  • gamertag: trayne
  • user homepage:

Tact is for those who aren't witty enough to be sarcastic.

No use cryin' over Spillt Milk

Posted by: Death v2
Posted by: shiv master
Posted by: Death v2
Actually it is a fact that usage stats are very benificial to playlist discussions, the goal of the optimatch forum


Quite. I agree that such figures are beneficial to Bungie personnel.
The issue is why, and even if, the bnet community should be privy to these statistics.
There just isn't any reason other than "it would be nice".


Is it unreasonable to ask for a simple copy and paste job by sketch, or anyone else with access to those statistics?


Why don't you just PM the President and ask for the precise troop deployments and strike plans?
I'm sure he could just copy and paste it.

Neither would be difficult to do.
You also don't need either.

  • 05.04.2007 5:25 PM PDT
  • gamertag:
  • user homepage:
  • last post: 01.01.0001 12:00 AM PDT

Posted by: shiv master
Posted by: Death v2
Posted by: shiv master
Posted by: Death v2
Actually it is a fact that usage stats are very benificial to playlist discussions, the goal of the optimatch forum


Quite. I agree that such figures are beneficial to Bungie personnel.
The issue is why, and even if, the bnet community should be privy to these statistics.
There just isn't any reason other than "it would be nice".


Is it unreasonable to ask for a simple copy and paste job by sketch, or anyone else with access to those statistics?


Why don't you just PM the President and ask for the precise troop deployments and strike plans?
I'm sure he could just copy and paste it.

Neither would be difficult to do.
You also don't need either.


Your example is terrible, it would be difficult to do, and it would cause massive problems. You are attempting to compare two entirely different situations in order to give your point some type of backing.

  • 05.04.2007 5:29 PM PDT
  • gamertag: trayne
  • user homepage:

Tact is for those who aren't witty enough to be sarcastic.

No use cryin' over Spillt Milk

Posted by: Death v2
Posted by: shiv master
Posted by: Death v2
Posted by: shiv master
Posted by: Death v2
Actually it is a fact that usage stats are very benificial to playlist discussions, the goal of the optimatch forum


Quite. I agree that such figures are beneficial to Bungie personnel.
The issue is why, and even if, the bnet community should be privy to these statistics.
There just isn't any reason other than "it would be nice".


Is it unreasonable to ask for a simple copy and paste job by sketch, or anyone else with access to those statistics?


Why don't you just PM the President and ask for the precise troop deployments and strike plans?
I'm sure he could just copy and paste it.

Neither would be difficult to do.
You also don't need either.


Your example is terrible, it would be difficult to do, and it would cause massive problems. You are attempting to compare two entirely different situations in order to give your point some type of backing.


I guess you're irony deficient.

They are both unreasonable because you have no reasonable expectation to be provided with either.

  • 05.04.2007 5:34 PM PDT
  • gamertag:
  • user homepage:
  • last post: 01.01.0001 12:00 AM PDT

Posted by: shiv master
Posted by: Death v2
Posted by: shiv master
Posted by: Death v2
Posted by: shiv master
Posted by: Death v2
Actually it is a fact that usage stats are very benificial to playlist discussions, the goal of the optimatch forum


Quite. I agree that such figures are beneficial to Bungie personnel.
The issue is why, and even if, the bnet community should be privy to these statistics.
There just isn't any reason other than "it would be nice".


Is it unreasonable to ask for a simple copy and paste job by sketch, or anyone else with access to those statistics?


Why don't you just PM the President and ask for the precise troop deployments and strike plans?
I'm sure he could just copy and paste it.

Neither would be difficult to do.
You also don't need either.


Your example is terrible, it would be difficult to do, and it would cause massive problems. You are attempting to compare two entirely different situations in order to give your point some type of backing.


I guess you're irony deficient.

They are both unreasonable because you have no reasonable expectation to be provided with either.

Please dont bring back arguments from 4 pages ago, really man

  • 05.04.2007 5:40 PM PDT
  • gamertag: trayne
  • user homepage:

Tact is for those who aren't witty enough to be sarcastic.

No use cryin' over Spillt Milk

Posted by: Death v2
Posted by: shiv master
Posted by: Death v2
Posted by: shiv master
Posted by: Death v2
Posted by: shiv master
Posted by: Death v2
Actually it is a fact that usage stats are very benificial to playlist discussions, the goal of the optimatch forum


Quite. I agree that such figures are beneficial to Bungie personnel.
The issue is why, and even if, the bnet community should be privy to these statistics.
There just isn't any reason other than "it would be nice".


Is it unreasonable to ask for a simple copy and paste job by sketch, or anyone else with access to those statistics?


Why don't you just PM the President and ask for the precise troop deployments and strike plans?
I'm sure he could just copy and paste it.

Neither would be difficult to do.
You also don't need either.


Your example is terrible, it would be difficult to do, and it would cause massive problems. You are attempting to compare two entirely different situations in order to give your point some type of backing.


I guess you're irony deficient.

They are both unreasonable because you have no reasonable expectation to be provided with either.

Please dont bring back arguments from 4 pages ago, really man


What?
You mean we aren't still, 8 pages later, still talking about you requesting information that you aren't going to get because you have no reason to have it?
Good...because that would just be absurd.

  • 05.04.2007 5:47 PM PDT
  • gamertag:
  • user homepage:
  • last post: 01.01.0001 12:00 AM PDT

Holy crap shiv and death, get over yoursleves. You guys argue like two kiddies arguing over who gets the new Pokemon game...You guys are basically re-stating sentences from pages back only with different words. Nobody is right nor wrong. You both have an opinion and arguing won't change a thing. I suggest you two just take a chill pill and lay off this thread for a while. How does that sound?

  • 05.04.2007 5:55 PM PDT
  • gamertag: trayne
  • user homepage:

Tact is for those who aren't witty enough to be sarcastic.

No use cryin' over Spillt Milk

Posted by: BrY FTW
Holy crap shiv and death, get over yoursleves. You guys argue like two kiddies arguing over who gets the new Pokemon game...You guys are basically re-stating sentences from pages back only with different words. Nobody is right nor wrong. You both have an opinion and arguing won't change a thing. I suggest you two just take a chill pill and lay off this thread for a while. How does that sound?


I actually agree with you for a change, Bry.
The whole point was to see if he'd eventually realize that, while he was accusing me of posting the same points, he was doing the same thing.
The difference is that I wasn't calling the mods on him.

  • 05.04.2007 6:07 PM PDT
  • gamertag:
  • user homepage:
  • last post: 01.01.0001 12:00 AM PDT

Posted by: shiv master
Posted by: BrY FTW
Holy crap shiv and death, get over yoursleves. You guys argue like two kiddies arguing over who gets the new Pokemon game...You guys are basically re-stating sentences from pages back only with different words. Nobody is right nor wrong. You both have an opinion and arguing won't change a thing. I suggest you two just take a chill pill and lay off this thread for a while. How does that sound?


I actually agree with you for a change, Bry.
The whole point was to see if he'd eventually realize that, while he was accusing me of posting the same points, he was doing the same thing.
The difference is that I wasn't calling the mods on him.


Ive said numerous times
Please dont bring back arguments from 4 pages ago, really man
I specifically said one post numerous times.
Seems like I didnt know that I was saying things that were pretty old...

So, BTW, if it were to stop me from making the same points again, why did you post this on the first page, before I couldve started using the same points multiple times?

Or all the spoiled brats could stop acting like they're owed something.
I don't see that we as a community have any reasonable expectation to be privy to more information than what is provided by the WWU.
As Recon already said, this is not a support site.

Wait....are you upset because I didn't suggest that you be submitted for the Nobel prize instead?

It hardly seems like you were being civil to start, then saw me do something and decided to attack me... but wait, are you admitting that you attacked other users, derailed a topic, and generally acted like an ass in order to prove a personal point? And I thought things couldnt get any worse.

  • 05.04.2007 8:03 PM PDT
  • gamertag: [none]
  • user homepage:

Just drop it, we don't need to drag this discussion out any more, especially seeing as how it isn't even on-topic anymore.

  • 05.04.2007 8:07 PM PDT
  • gamertag: trayne
  • user homepage:

Tact is for those who aren't witty enough to be sarcastic.

No use cryin' over Spillt Milk

Haha...Death, Death, Death...

You bumped this topic up from halfway down the page just to tell me that?

You should've just kept PMing me instead. At least in PM I can call you a raging jackass without you calling in the mods.

  • 05.04.2007 8:11 PM PDT
  •  | 
  • Exalted Mythic Member

The Frozen Minority - The most infamous clan borne from the Seventh Column.

Locked for being an offtopic argument. This discussion is [/].

  • 05.04.2007 10:49 PM PDT