- kalle90
- |
- Intrepid Mythic Member
1.Arkham Asylum, 2.Mass Effect, 3.Halo CE, 4.Mass Effect 2, 5.Halo 2, 6.Splinter Cell Double Agent, 7.Gears of War 2, 8.Medievil, 9.Oblivion, 10.Crash Team Racing
Posted by: ghostvirus
Halo 1> Halo 2
Halo 3 > Halo 1
Halo 2s had a very disapointing story. Even the mutliplayer could have been better. Bungie admited they screwed up Halo 2's campaign AND multiplayer. Bungie admits they didn't schedule there time properly whcih resulted in them lagging behind. Additionally the direction of campaign was changed later in the games development. The result was lots of things were cut and didn't have time to be fleshed out. Because of there mistake they had to rush with Halo 2 and even then the game had to be delayed. Not that Halo 2 sucks it just doesn't hold it's own against the orginal. After playing the beta and hearing /seeing/new things coming for Halo 3 as well as playing the beta i can safely say Halo 3 will be the worthy sequel we've been waiting for.
Like i said:
HaloCE is good game in anyway, good story, good Ai, good weapons, good levels and some great moments, I cant think any faults of HaloCE, that arent just opinions, its just a good game.
Halo2 just was too much for Xbox. Everything that was bad in Halo2 was because technics, good graphics but big loading problems, Ai freezes and no much new things or surprises, game is almost only driving and destroying Ghosts because so many things were left out of Halo2, everything else could be fixed with polishing and checking, i dont think Bungie intentions were to have this game after HaloCE. I can look past these problems and its great game. I blame Xbox and hope Xbox360 gives Bungie chance to make game that they want.
HaloCE was the best, Halo2 is now slightly better, but difference is so small i cant really say Halo2 is better. But why you care what Bungie said, it shouldnt matter our opinion.
[Edited on 07.08.2007 3:19 AM PDT]