- last post: 01.01.0001 12:00 AM PDT
Posted by: RidiculousX
Not as low as they ought to be. I mean, come on, how old is the Xbox system that they're porting this game from? Why do they choose to lock out a lot of people by using high system requirements as the bar of entry?
I'm disappointed. Maybe it has something to do with Live for Windows, maybe not. I don't see why the requirements need to be so high for a three year old game on a five year old system.
All the new features better make up for it.
Here's why: In the XBOX, their engine used a trick in which objects far away were rendered with an increasingly lower polygon count as you get further away from them. In the PC version, The removed this feature from the engine, allowing all objects to retain their full polygon count, even from a large distance.
Posted by: No Refunds
I'm on the border of running it on full resolution with 4xAA on medium. Or small resolution and no AA on high. Choose for me because I have yet to see the game (and based on amazon's shipping I won't till next week <.<)
Med, High Res with AA. It will be XBOX 360 quality but with nativly rendered High-Res.
Posted by: XvXHalo3XvX
GAaaayyyy
EDIT:
Second opinion anyone?????
LMAO, don't worry about it. You will be able to run everything on Max with 1900x1200 Res (If supported by your config).
Posted by: Tristania
If I can
t get max out of it then something is definetely wrong.
Vista Home Premium
AMD Athlon 64 X2 4400+ 2.31 GHz
2gigs ram
EVGA GeForce 7950 GT KO
BFG Ageia PhysX Processor
SB X-Fi Xtreme Gamer
Yea, you'll get Max.
[Edited on 05.21.2007 5:40 PM PDT]