Halo: Combat Evolved Forum
This topic has moved here: Subject: Should Bungie Remake Halo 1 for the xbox 360 so we can play online?
  • Subject: Should Bungie Remake Halo 1 for the xbox 360 so we can play online?
  • Pages:
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • of 3
Subject: Should Bungie Remake Halo 1 for the xbox 360 so we can play online?
  • gamertag:
  • user homepage:
  • last post: 01.01.0001 12:00 AM PDT

Hey, I'm just wondering, but isn't this thread supposed to be a petition? And aren't petitions against the forum rules? :DPosted by: JFiZz3L23
All the fans of Halo please sign, vote and explain ur ideas of remaking Halo: Combat Evolved for the Xbox360,so we can play online.

  • 06.19.2007 10:52 AM PDT

Posted by: Master Kim
Hey, I'm just wondering, but isn't this thread supposed to be a petition? And aren't petitions against the forum rules? :DPosted by: JFiZz3L23
All the fans of Halo please sign, vote and explain ur ideas of remaking Halo: Combat Evolved for the Xbox360,so we can play online.


Forget everything HaloTitan and I said

This ends the thread right here.

[Edited on 06.19.2007 11:36 AM PDT]

  • 06.19.2007 11:24 AM PDT
  • gamertag:
  • user homepage:
  • last post: 01.01.0001 12:00 AM PDT

Posted by: BattleRifle BR55
Posted by: Godfather29
Posted by: BattleRifle BR55
Posted by: DARKMASSA
yes they should bring it back because halo:ce is still awesome and it's awesomenes would be X9000 TIMES BETTER and if you think this isn't true then your not a real halo fan nuf said.


If you're a real fan then by now you'd understand why they wouldn't, won't, and can't make this game online - geez I can't believe the people that post all this stuff as to why they should.

1) Bungie doesn't like Halo 1 Multiplayer that much anymore - there's a reason why certain things changed drastically for the following two games.
2) Why do people view the pistol as balanced? The most ridiculous reason I've ever heard for that is that everyone starts out with one. So what if everyone spawned with a rocket launcher that could clear the entire map? Would that be balanced too?
3) This is a 6 year old Xbox game and you want them to remake it for the 360 with online capabilities!? Alright, I know there are some games that are classics that people still play to this day, but c'mon - an Xbox-Live version of Halo 1 is just stupid to think about at this point in time.

If you really want to play halo online - do what everyone else is doing - get XBC or get Halo PC - they may not be the best alternatives, but they're the only ones you got.



people these days are soo -blam!- retarded, if ur a real fan this, if ur a real fan that. well if ur a real fan then u would know how great halo 1 is and how much better it is than halo 2 and so far, halo 3

1)bungie doesnt like halo 1 multiplayer anymore???? where the -blam!- did u get that bull-blam!- from
2)the pistol is balanced and for that very reason, cuz everyone starts with one, and it is good for every situation. that way there is no weapon whoring, like in halo 2. in halo 2 the whole game plan was rush the snipe, rush sword, rush rockets, and then if u didnt get those weapons u were stuck with the -blam!- smg, have a fun time, is that balanced?? by having everyone start with a pistol, u could always get out of a situation, there was always a chance that you would defeat the guy with rockets, sniper, etc.
3) yes the game is six years old, and ur point is........? so ur telling me that just cuz a game is old they shouldnt remake it?? then y do they make doom, castlevania: SOTN, Contra, etc for xbox live arcade, those games are even older???

my final point is yes, they should make this game for xbox live, dont change the graphics, dont change the glitches (BLB, backpack reloading, etc), dotn change the maps, but add new maps, also maybe the save film feature should be added as well, but nothing else. now that's a recipe for an amazing game


OKAY I was ready to explode on you, but I've decided to tone myself down a bit. Since you call me retarded for saying Bungie doesn't like Halo 1's Multiplayer - I'm guessing you've NEVER EVER read one Halo 2 or 3 Weekly Update that included them, nor ever seen any new footage that Bungie has out for Halo 3. AND THAT is why I say 'If you're a real fan by now you'd understand'. Don't go shooting your mouth off about things you don't know.

And no - as I said - the pistol isn't balanced because everyone else starts out with it. You can put SOOOO many examples to that reason why, such as the rocket one I included. This weapon did everything. Of course, there are games where one weapon stands out amongst the rest. But sometimes it causes alot of problems. Let's take Counter Strike - probably the most popular multiplayer shooter in the world. You think everything there is perfect? The Deagle drops you faster (of course, with the way the game works) and what about the AWP - there are many many servers that outlaw it. Well what does Counter Strike have to do with Halo 1, you might wonder. Nothing really, I'm just showing you some examples of why certain power weapons are no fun for alot.

I play Halo PC, I never drop my pistol, I rarely cease to not place first. It becomes very boring after a while, and there are periods where I don't play for months because of how boring '*bang* *bang* *bang* You killed New001, repeat' becomes. Once I get Vista, I doubt I'll be playing Halo PC anymore. I honestly don't see how some of you can keep doing this all day. Of course, me liking Halo 2 over Halo 1 is my opinion, but with your argument, I guess I'm not a real fan.

The reasons those games came back are because I'm sure those games don't have an online matchmaking, okay? Halo 1 cannot support it - it came out long before Xbox Live did - and without recoding a large portion of the game, they cannot add online matchmaking. Yet again, you'd have to read some of the early updates to realize that.

You can add so many things to this 'if you're a real fan' statement

What about 'if you're a real fan, you'd see why Bungie tried to push Halo towards a new direction'
'If you're a real fan, you'd see why Bungie continues to make new games, because their previous ones are successful (Halo 2-Halo 3)
'If you're a real fan, you'd know why remaking the exact same game, with the exact same graphics, with the exact same glitches, and the exact same maps is the most confusing stupid thing ever, because what's to be gained from it?'

Why bring back Halo 1 exactly as is, but with Halo 3's saved films feature? You know what. I have an idea. Go start your own company, and ask Bungie and Microsoft if you can port Halo 1. Because A) They never will. B) If the did, we'd be playing the exact same game, just with more people at more times, C) Bungie has better things to do than please you people with your pistol addictions. Just please, let go, give up. It's never happening, and it never will. Bungie doesn't like the pistol, so they will not bring back Halo 1 especially after developing Halo 2 and Halo 3 to further advance Halo 1. Why go through all that trouble, just for you guys to think that they would say 'Okay, guys, our new games sucked. Let's just remake Halo 1, throw some of our newest features in. I cab't believe we wasted 6 years of our time when we could have just remade Halo and moved to Acapulco'

Guess who would be the only people buying this new Online-enabled Halo? The only people who don't know how to let go and move on. Why is that, you see? Well, not only would this game suffer having some of the worst graphics on the 360, but to people that gave up Halo long ago because of no online - I doubt that several years later they'd be on their knees in tears of happiness.

I've said it once, I'll say it once again. BUNGIE WILL NOT REMAKE HALO 1. Bungie is about moving forward, as any company is. They, along with Microsoft realize that halo 1 with Xbox Live would sell, but just how much? And look did Bungie port Halo 1 to the PC? No. They have other things to worry about *CoughHalo2Cough*. Did they port Halo 2 to PC? No, again, they have other things to worry about (Just in caase you haven't realized yet, Halo 3)

Halo 3 is Bungie's newest game. They are proud at how far they've come from Halo 1's success, and they are trying to improve on it. Why go so far only to turn back just for the ones that got left behind?

Think about that.



okay pretty much ur whole post makes no -blam!- sense but anyways:

paragraph 1-okay u were about to explode and i dont read weekly updates, which i do, and let me guess, ur post arguing this is gonna say "u obviously dont read them because then u would know wut im talking about", well just cuz they are "doing new stuff with halo 3" it doesnt mean they didnt like teh things from halo 1, woopdee -blam!- doo

paragraph 2-okay, lets take ur retarded example, if everyone started with rockets its balanced: no it's not u dumb -blam!-, if everyone started with rockets then everyone would rush to the sniper and sniper whore because rockets dont do -blam!- long range, which is wut halo 2 is, rush snipe, etc, but in halo 1 u can take the sniper, rocket, etc. out with the pistol. nice example though

paragraph 3-thanx for letting us know that u are bored with the pistol, waste of my life reading it

paragraph 4-DID I EVER -blam!- SAY U DONT HAVE TO RECODE THE GAME???? sure it would take some time, but definitly not as long as making a full game, and bungie has plenty of time to do this AFTER releasing halo 3

paragraph 5-confusing?? im sorry does ur brain hurt after ALL THAT THINKING?

paragraph 6-thanks ill go do that

paragraph 7-gameplay>graphics, but only a real fan would know that

and the rest of ur post is nonsense, because if bungie would remake halo 1 with online capabilities it would be AFTER they release halo 3, not at the same time they are making it

think about that? sure

  • 06.19.2007 12:04 PM PDT
  • gamertag:
  • user homepage:
  • last post: 01.01.0001 12:00 AM PDT

Posted by: BattleRifle BR55
Posted by: Master Kim
Hey, I'm just wondering, but isn't this thread supposed to be a petition? And aren't petitions against the forum rules? :DPosted by: JFiZz3L23
All the fans of Halo please sign, vote and explain ur ideas of remaking Halo: Combat Evolved for the Xbox360,so we can play online.


Forget everything HaloTitan and I said

This ends the thread right here.
Nonetheless, you two make a good argument. However, it's all a moot point, considering how it's not going to happen.

  • 06.19.2007 12:48 PM PDT

You're a funny one - I was going to reply with all the necessary information such as the videos and quotes where Bungie talks about the pistol, but I don't care enough to at this point.

Your response to my paragraph shows what I'm getting at - If the pistol can take on everything else - why bother with anything else? All it does is kill differently - but there is no real need for anything else but the pistol. Why swear at me? You proved my point by saying the rockets I mentioned aren't balanced - I was relating it to the pistol. Halo 2 gives you different roles - grab a rocket and take vehicles out. Grab a sniper, and pick enemies off at long range. Stuck with an SMG? Try not to travel into places you shouldn't go. Halo 1 puts you into one role - and that is destroying the entire map with a tiny pistol.

In terms of recoding the game - what's the damn point - they'd have to remake it, which costs time and money so Bungie can please you people that just cant let go of the past and move on. Why make it afterwards? What; does Bungie have nothing better to do after Halo 3? They'll be on their next project. They're a game developing business, it's what they do. They move forward. I'm pretty sure they're not going to head back to a game they've replaced and will replace again.

Sure gameplay>graphics - but what the hell is the point? Why did Bungie even bother Make Halo 3 with new graphics - since the old ones from Halo 1 are just fine - why change it? Sure gameplay is more important - but that doesnt mean graphics are unimportant - after all, that is one major reason for all the technological advancements. If you didn't know any better about Halo - would you pick up the game if you saw it in a store? 'Hmm look, this game came out in 2001 - yeah I'd buy it on my 2005+ console'

Bungie would only be making Halo 1 on Xbox Live for you select people - that's not what they want. Why do you think Halo 2 is more team-based than skilled base? Why did they make the game easy to pick up? It's so everyone can play. It's so that people who suck won't be at a score of 1/24 as much.

Why is it so hard to accept that Halo 1 is not coming back? Get your buddies over and play LAN - that's what the game was designed for. Halo 2 was designed for Xbox Live - two different ways of playing. Don't like one style? Put in the other game. Can't stand that either? Do something else.

This reminds me of a famous book, 'The Great Gatsby' - in that you people really need to learn to let go because times have changed.

Halo 1 is not coming back, and at this point, it never will.

  • 06.19.2007 12:48 PM PDT
  • gamertag:
  • user homepage:
  • last post: 01.01.0001 12:00 AM PDT

Posted by: Godfather29
paragraph 7-gameplay>graphics, but only a real fan would know that
In this time and age, you and I both know that graphics, despite the fact they are only second place to gameplay, are very important. Last time I checked, people didn't buy Halo: Combat Evolved because just because of its gameplay--it had some of the most amazing visuals of its time.

Only a real fanboy would say that.

  • 06.19.2007 12:54 PM PDT

Posted by: Master Kim
Posted by: Godfather29
paragraph 7-gameplay>graphics, but only a real fan would know that
In this time and age, you and I both know that graphics, despite the fact they are only second place to gameplay, are very important. Last time I checked, people didn't buy Halo: Combat Evolved because just because of its gameplay--it had some of the most amazing visuals of its time.

Only a real fanboy would say that.


Exactly - after all, it is one reason Valve chose to make their own engine for Half-Life 2, rather than stick with the one they used for the first game. It is one reason why Halo 3 doesn't look like Halo 1

Graphics have taken a much bigger role these days. Look at how deep Halo 3 and Crysis are going to be graphics wise - and the gameplay will still hold up. In this day and age - graphics + gameplay

  • 06.19.2007 12:56 PM PDT
  • gamertag:
  • user homepage:
  • last post: 01.01.0001 12:00 AM PDT

Posted by: BattleRifle BR55
You're a funny one - I was going to reply with all the necessary information such as the videos and quotes where Bungie talks about the pistol, but I don't care enough to at this point.

Your response to my paragraph shows what I'm getting at - If the pistol can take on everything else - why bother with anything else? All it does is kill differently - but there is no real need for anything else but the pistol. Why swear at me? You proved my point by saying the rockets I mentioned aren't balanced - I was relating it to the pistol. Halo 2 gives you different roles - grab a rocket and take vehicles out. Grab a sniper, and pick enemies off at long range. Stuck with an SMG? Try not to travel into places you shouldn't go. Halo 1 puts you into one role - and that is destroying the entire map with a tiny pistol.

In terms of recoding the game - what's the damn point - they'd have to remake it, which costs time and money so Bungie can please you people that just cant let go of the past and move on. Why make it afterwards? What; does Bungie have nothing better to do after Halo 3? They'll be on their next project. They're a game developing business, it's what they do. They move forward. I'm pretty sure they're not going to head back to a game they've replaced and will replace again.

Sure gameplay>graphics - but what the hell is the point? Why did Bungie even bother Make Halo 3 with new graphics - since the old ones from Halo 1 are just fine - why change it? Sure gameplay is more important - but that doesnt mean graphics are unimportant - after all, that is one major reason for all the technological advancements. If you didn't know any better about Halo - would you pick up the game if you saw it in a store? 'Hmm look, this game came out in 2001 - yeah I'd buy it on my 2005+ console'

Bungie would only be making Halo 1 on Xbox Live for you select people - that's not what they want. Why do you think Halo 2 is more team-based than skilled base? Why did they make the game easy to pick up? It's so everyone can play. It's so that people who suck won't be at a score of 1/24 as much.

Why is it so hard to accept that Halo 1 is not coming back? Get your buddies over and play LAN - that's what the game was designed for. Halo 2 was designed for Xbox Live - two different ways of playing. Don't like one style? Put in the other game. Can't stand that either? Do something else.

This reminds me of a famous book, 'The Great Gatsby' - in that you people really need to learn to let go because times have changed.

Halo 1 is not coming back, and at this point, it never will.


ok u obviously dont understand wut im saying about the pistol. by starting out with the pistol you always have a chance to win, you always have a chance to take on anything, but that doesnt mean it's easy and there's no point in using other weapons. at long range, chances are that the sniper will -blam!- the pistol, but there is still a chance that the person with the pistol will win, same goes for rockets, chances are that they will -blam!- in medium-close range against the pistol, but there is still a chance that the person with the pistol will pull off an amazing three shot kill and kill the rocket guy. my point is that by starting out with the pistol, ur never in a postition where u cant win, but in halo 2 if u have an smg and ur going against a long range sniper, u have no chance at all, and its looking to be the same with halo 3

now about the graphics: i didnt say that graphics dont matter, they sure do. we were talking about the subject of remaking halo 1 with xbox live for 360, and i suggested that the graphics not change at all because it would take away from the original, classic look of halo 1, not because they dont matter

  • 06.19.2007 2:08 PM PDT

As I said - don't run out in the open if all you have is an smg. Obviously you're no match for a sniper - that's the point.

  • 06.19.2007 2:47 PM PDT
  • gamertag:
  • user homepage:
  • last post: 01.01.0001 12:00 AM PDT

Posted by: BattleRifle BR55
As I said - don't run out in the open if all you have is an smg. Obviously you're no match for a sniper - that's the point.


ok plz use ur brain, its not only the sniper, its the rockets, sword, noob combo, etc. all it is is rushing weapons and if u dont get them u lose because of the retarded weapon respawn system in halo 2

and can we plz stop arguing about the pistol i already won that arguement. halo 1 isnt better only because of the pistol. no autoaim, no jumping higher and walking slower, no retarded lunging melees, no bullet magnetism, the plasma weapons have a freezing effect, i could go on and on, and the overall feel of halo 2 sucks ass, it just doesnt feel like halo, and halo 3 is better in many parts than halo 2, such as the autoaim and bullet magnetism, even though it still has the lunging melees and the plasma weapons dont freeze, but it still doesnt have that "it" factor that halo 1 has. if u want all the specifics as to why halo 2 blows ass, go to www.halo2sucks.com

[Edited on 06.19.2007 2:58 PM PDT]

  • 06.19.2007 2:57 PM PDT

Alright you win - want a cookie?

.......

But then again why do I fare so well with the smg? Remember the fact that it is a spawn weapon - it isn't mean to desimate; it fulfills the same role the MA5C is taking - to hold your own until you find a better weapon. Sure it's underpowered - but it serves a different purpose from the starting weapons of Halo 1. Halo 2 was rushed, and Bungie is making up for it in Halo 3.

How did you win the pistol argument? All you did was say about how it could decimate any weapon an enemy could use - I wouldn't exactly say that's a plus.

Complaining that 'the overall feeling of Halo 2 sucks; doesn't feel like Halo' isn't a valid argument because all you're pushing is opinion.

  • 06.19.2007 3:09 PM PDT
  • gamertag:
  • user homepage:
  • last post: 01.01.0001 12:00 AM PDT

Posted by: Godfather29
ok plz use ur brain
Oh my God, the irony!

Posted by: Godfather29
its not only the sniper, its the rockets, sword, noob combo, etc. all it is is rushing weapons and if u dont get them u lose because of the retarded weapon respawn system in halo 2
Yeah, because the timed respawns of each weapon and each player knowing when the sniper rifle was going to respawn is nowhere near as unbalanced as Halo 2's power weapons.

Posted by: Godfather29
and can we plz stop arguing about the pistol i already won that arguement.
It may be a matter of opinion, but you can't "win" arguments--those who think they "won" them have already "lost." You're arguing with opinion.

Posted by: Godfather29
halo 1 isnt better only because of the pistol. no autoaim, no jumping higher and walking slower, no retarded lunging melees, no bullet magnetism, the plasma weapons have a freezing effect, i could go on and on, and the overall feel of halo 2 sucks ass, it just doesnt feel like halo, and halo 3 is better in many parts than halo 2, such as the autoaim and bullet magnetism, even though it still has the lunging melees and the plasma weapons dont freeze, but it still doesnt have that "it" factor that halo 1 has. if u want all the specifics as to why halo 2 blows ass, go to www.halo2sucks.com
You bring the H2S name to shame.

  • 06.19.2007 6:28 PM PDT

If you come up to me and say "zomg all u need is pistol in h1" I'd automatically know that you suck at halo 1.

that is all.

<edit> please dont defend the logic of spawning with smgs. bungie has already admitted that this was not a wise decision on their part.

[Edited on 06.20.2007 2:20 AM PDT]

  • 06.20.2007 2:06 AM PDT

Inside the Mind of Halotitan Help me get expand my mind.

Posted by: blueterroR
If you come up to me and say "zomg all u need is pistol in h1" I'd automatically know that you suck at halo 1.

that is all.

<edit> please dont defend the logic of spawning with smgs. bungie has already admitted that this was not a wise decision on their part.


Really? Link to wherever you read this or saw this statement. The only thing I recall them saying is that smg starts took away from grenades and melee because more people were likely to dual weild. Never heard them saying it wasn't wise so therefore i require proof. Thank you.

  • 06.20.2007 4:55 AM PDT

Posted by: HaloTitan
Posted by: blueterroR
If you come up to me and say "zomg all u need is pistol in h1" I'd automatically know that you suck at halo 1.

that is all.

<edit> please dont defend the logic of spawning with smgs. bungie has already admitted that this was not a wise decision on their part.


Really? Link to wherever you read this or saw this statement. The only thing I recall them saying is that smg starts took away from grenades and melee because more people were likely to dual weild. Never heard them saying it wasn't wise so therefore i require proof. Thank you.

Yeah, because game developers are really big on signed confessions.

They knew it wasn't great and they fixed it. There's no point being bitter and arguing with people over it because you thought there wasn't a problem.

  • 06.20.2007 6:08 AM PDT
  • gamertag:
  • user homepage:
  • last post: 01.01.0001 12:00 AM PDT

Posted by: BattleRifle BR55

How did you win the pistol argument? All you did was say about how it could decimate any weapon an enemy could use - I wouldn't exactly say that's a plus.



once again ur being retarded, when the -blam!- did i say it could desimate any weapon, u need to learn how to read, wut i said was that by starting with the pistol, it always gives u a chance to win in any situation, not desimate any weapon, if ur goin against a sniper, ur obviously highly overpowered, but u still have a CHANCE to kill him by starting with the pistol, by starting with the smg u have no -blam!- chance in hell if the sniper is decent, and dont say "oh, well u shouldnt go out in the open then" because its not only the sniper, its the sword, rockets, noob combo, shotgun, etc, not only the sniper.

once again u failed to use ur brain

  • 06.20.2007 7:27 AM PDT
  • gamertag:
  • user homepage:
  • last post: 01.01.0001 12:00 AM PDT

Posted by: Godfather29
once again ur being retarded

Posted by: Godfather29
u need to learn how to read

Posted by: Godfather29
once again u failed to use ur brain
The irony. Make it stop.

  • 06.20.2007 8:53 AM PDT

Posted by: Master Kim
Posted by: Godfather29
once again ur being retarded

Posted by: Godfather29
u need to learn how to read

Posted by: Godfather29
once again u failed to use ur brain
The irony. Make it stop.


Yeah, I won't give him a reason to keep going anymore. His argument that a weapon that can combat every single weapon in the game with ease has no problems is starting to get to me.

  • 06.20.2007 9:17 AM PDT

Inside the Mind of Halotitan Help me get expand my mind.

Posted by: RhythmKiller
Posted by: HaloTitan
Posted by: blueterroR
If you come up to me and say "zomg all u need is pistol in h1" I'd automatically know that you suck at halo 1.

that is all.

<edit> please dont defend the logic of spawning with smgs. bungie has already admitted that this was not a wise decision on their part.


Really? Link to wherever you read this or saw this statement. The only thing I recall them saying is that smg starts took away from grenades and melee because more people were likely to dual weild. Never heard them saying it wasn't wise so therefore i require proof. Thank you.

Yeah, because game developers are really big on signed confessions.

They knew it wasn't great and they fixed it. There's no point being bitter and arguing with people over it because you thought there wasn't a problem.


Signed confessions, well guess what thats the only way i'll believe his argument. I'm not disagreeing with him, I just want some valid proof. I'm not bitter and I will argue when people state facts but don't back it up. I'll own anyone with an SMG, but thats just me ;)

[Edited on 06.20.2007 10:23 AM PDT]

  • 06.20.2007 10:23 AM PDT

If I had a Rocket Launcher...

Shut up and get behind me... Sir!

The cable. I'm going to cut it.

Awesomeness would ensue.

As long as gameplay wasn't changed in the slightest.

  • 06.20.2007 10:57 AM PDT
  • gamertag:
  • user homepage:
  • last post: 01.01.0001 12:00 AM PDT

Posted by: BattleRifle BR55
Posted by: Master Kim
Posted by: Godfather29
once again ur being retarded

Posted by: Godfather29
u need to learn how to read

Posted by: Godfather29
once again u failed to use ur brain
The irony. Make it stop.


Yeah, I won't give him a reason to keep going anymore. His argument that a weapon that can combat every single weapon in the game with ease has no problems is starting to get to me.


thank u , u finally ran out of retarded things to say, but you had to include one more to announce ur defeat cuz u got nothing else to say, god i love proving ppl wrong

PS: tell master kim not to suck ur dick too hard

  • 06.20.2007 7:30 PM PDT

They should remake both Halo 1 and 2 with all the bugs and glitches fixed in campaign and multiplayer for the next generation Xbox as a triple pack with Halo 3.

  • 06.20.2007 7:59 PM PDT

heres why halo 1 needed pistol start:

Camo and rocket. Ive played kids who are half decent with the pistol and Ive barely used the pistol aganist them. why? because camo rocket is hard to kill for a pistoler, it would just be so much much worse if they didnt have pistols at all. Now heres some more examples of pistols at an DISADVANTAGE:

the assault rifle is a faster, meaner melee weapon. also makes you quick camo, making you even more powerful when wielding rocket and camo. when without shields, you cannot outstrafe assault rifle.

the shotgun. close range. dead.

the plasma rifle. you are always at a disadvantage if you get frozen, even if you have overshield. it is the perfect weapon to pick up to counter overshield and is an important weapon for 1v1 wizard, prisioner.


rocket and sniper. dont need to say much for this one.

pretty much every weapon was situational and could beat the pistol with the exception of the needler. this made pistol starts for halo 1 the successful settings for the game.

if smgs dont work as the effective starting weapon whats your propsal for what should be a good model for a starting weapon? the battle rifle? the br is pretty much similar to the pistol in its function that u can take on any situation, but its also flawed because theres not much emphasis on skillful aiming. A game is more fun when you practice and practice the fundamentals of strafing and shooting and halo 2 watered down that aspect.

A perfect starting weapon puts emphasis on skill with a infinite learning curve, is the all around weapon that has weaknesses aganist almost all guns that are situational in their uses. It is also a gun that has range to fit any map and make all maps fun to play on. historically, the ce pisotl is the only gun that has achieved this and is perfect for tournament play.Just.....look at hang em high and look at tombstones. If you disagree, its your option but this is the gold standard for competitive halo ce gaming.

this is why i know that people are bad when they think that the pistols the only thing they need for halo 1. you dont win games if you only use 1 gun unless the other team doesnt know wtf they r doing.

  • 06.20.2007 9:38 PM PDT
  • gamertag:
  • user homepage:
  • last post: 01.01.0001 12:00 AM PDT

Posted by: BattleRifle BR55
[

They, along with Microsoft realize that halo 1 with Xbox Live would sell, but just how much? And look did Bungie port Halo 1 to the PC? No. They have other things to worry about *CoughHalo2Cough*. Did they port Halo 2 to PC? No, again, they have other things to worry about (Just in caase you haven't realized yet, Halo 3)


Think about that.



The fact that you write this post to change history is not only Orwellian, its ignorant.

Halo PC is a computer game. It is a port of Halo: Combat Evolved that was released on the Original xbox in 2001. Halo 2, an XBOX game, was later ported to the PC as Halo 2 Vista. Tell me sirs, are you stupid or something?


[Edited on 06.20.2007 10:32 PM PDT]

  • 06.20.2007 10:29 PM PDT
  • gamertag:
  • user homepage:
  • last post: 01.01.0001 12:00 AM PDT

Posted by: Godfather29
thank u , u finally ran out of retarded things to say, but you had to include one more to announce ur defeat cuz u got nothing else to say, god i love proving ppl wrong

PS: tell master kim not to suck ur dick too hard
Hahaha, haha, hahaaaahahahahahahahaha.

You love proving people wrong, eh? Got nothing better to do with your time on this forum than to do that? After all, what's this forum for without discussion or arguments? However, people could do without your incessant, constant rude remarks consisting of your thirty-word vocabulary.

Your maturity (or lack there of) is revealed when you can do nothing more but reply with childish fifth grade insults. I've heard better come backs from a dog turd laying in my front yard. You call others retarded when you serious lack intelligence yourself, and fail to back up your arguments--all you're doing is trying to pick a fight with people by calling them crude, low-brow words that I would expect from a ten-year-old. God, you're worse than me. Just stop it, you're making yourself look more of an asinine retarded jackass than you already are.

"u finally ran out of retarded things to say" Well, you sure haven't!

  • 06.21.2007 5:12 AM PDT

  • Pages:
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • of 3