- last post: 01.01.0001 12:00 AM PDT
Posted by: Shdwsnipa
Perhaps I should have kept going in my post from earlier. Remember my point about how games don't use the same engine? Well NOT EVERY COMPUTER IS IDENTICAL. Everyone has problems on every OS. XP, Vista, DOS 3.0, Ubuntu, all of them. To think that you would be so self-centered as to think that EVERYONE has the same -blam!- as you is beyond me. "Oh no, I can't run my -blam!- organizing hardware! Everyone must have the same problem!" No, dip-blam!-, that's your problem. News flash: not all of us have the same stuff as you. I will admit, I have had a problem or two with my X-Fi console. It doesn't mean that it's going to stay that way, idiot! This may come as a surprise, but things can be fixed with magical files called patches and driver updates! Sometimes they can even be called "service packs"! Another surprise, XP had these! Could that possibly mean that maybe XP had the same problems as Vista when it first came out? No way, XP was definitely perfect to start with, they just felt like making a new OS anyway. Dumbass.
It's also amazing to see someone like Ryanman or fred_whatever have the audacity to point out things that they believe to be useless and think that nobody else needs it. Aw, poor baby, don't like the security? Then turn it off -blam!-, if you don't need it, don't use it. Though from what I've seen, you probably need such security from the "special sites" you most likely go to.
Even further, you go on to say that Aero or other graphic modifications are the biggest change in the system, implying that you've looked into every change in the OS and know everything about it. This, obviously, is complete bull-blam!-. This not only shows that you pay more attention to this "eye candy" than the system's actual functions, but also shows along with your other technical inaccuracies that you know next to jack -blam!- about computers. I truly wish that I could throw shiny objects through the Internet, so that I could distract you away from these forums.
Well, until next time, shut the -blam!- up so there won't have to be a next time.
You're still comparing Vista to XP like it was when it was released. Like you said, Service Packs come out. and XP is not the same. XP was arguably worse off than Vista - It had massive security issues that Vista didn't have at launch.
Not everyone has the same problem, but if you check the percentages people have more problems on Vista than on XP. It's new, it's relatively unpatched, We KNOW this and like I said in my previous post I have no doubt that once compatibility issues are fixed Vista will be superior. But you all keep talking about the past and the future here - I'm talking about now.
Why should I have to sift through the OS looking for minor changes that Microsoft decided would be better? Go ahead and name the other huge changes that Vista Brings to the table that make it worthwhile. The only huge change that is evident to most user's is aeroglass. Is it useless? not quite. It looks pretty and has some basic functionality improvements. Is it worth 170 bucks? (oh yeah, and H2V compatibility) That's the question you have to ask and I'm saying that most users are gonna say no.
Posted by: Shdwsnipa
Though from what I've seen, you probably need such security from the "special sites" you most likely go to.
Congratz. You're trying to insult someone over the internet because of an operating system/game discussion which means you're cool.
[Edited on 07.17.2007 12:20 PM PDT]