- last post: 01.01.0001 12:00 AM PDT
Posted by: DarkJester95
Whats the deal with the new ranking setup? It now longer is based on your ability but rather on number of wins??!!! Get out of here thats pathetic!!! Why do I care about being ranked if its only being done so that I can keep track of an insignificant number?! The only reason there should be ranking is so that people can be put it to weight classes so to speak. For example, I go into a match up expecting to have a game, a fair one, instead I'm pit against people who's level of play is beyond my comprehension. What does this result it? Matches that are equivalent to a lightweight against the world heavyweight champion!!!! HOW IS THAT FUN!!! Theres no reason for such uneven match ups. My idea of fun is going into a match with someone at my level and we duke it out and the score is in a dead heat 40-44 with 5minutes remaining. Those types of, edge of your seat matches ARE fun to play. I think they need to switch back ASAP. I'm writing a letter. What was wrong with the old ranking system? Theres no way that the new setup is better. Sure you have your derankers but they were few and far between unworthy of changing a perfect working system just so that one minuscule aspect of gameing is altered (definitely not at all improved). Has anyone else had the chance to experience such slaughter? Is anyone else with me?
I know what he means!! On my first team sniper I was pitted aganst a Lv. 37, 41 ,45, and a 36!!!
[Edited on 07.26.2007 3:01 PM PDT]