- last post: 01.01.0001 12:00 AM PDT
Posted by: C Moth
Yep, if a person does something that kills themselves, inentionally or not, it should be a suicide. It shouldn't matter that someone has been shooting at you before hand.
My question was centered around the concept that if you deliver a hit that lowers the shields and they suicide, you get credit for the kill. But, if you shot the hell out of them and some mook comes up and happens to put a round into them, the second shooter get's the kill, but should not.
So, actually, it makes perfect sense considering that it was based on the actions that took place prior to the opponents death and the different ways that they are scored.
....Really?
So if I'm being shot, and the other team has 49, I can just suicide, and keep my team in the game. That doesn't work sorry. the way suicides count is the way it should be.
No, if you do not actually kill someone, you should not get a kill.
It does not make sense. One concerns you causing someone to kill themselves, and another involves a team fire. The person who gets the kill shot, should get the kill. Your system would have so many problems. Like i said, people would suicide to prevent kills. What if you brought a guy down to full shields, you die, and your teammate finishes him off. the system right now is exactly how it should be. If you don't actually cause someone's death, why should you get a kill?