- last post: 01.01.0001 12:00 AM PDT
Posted by: brownish pile253
Posted by: noob killa
Posted by: Wet 92 Noodle
Posted by: Wrecktified
Lockout is good but it gets controlled by the sniper. I like more symmetrical maps with a sniper for both teams.
Wreckfield, i find u hilarious. The sniper on lockout, unless he is an amazing sniper (rank 40+), is completely useless. Most people once they get shot by a sniper on lockout, they charge them with a sword, shotgun, etc, and with little space to run, the sniper is usually toast after a few kills/shots. Though if u can superbounce, the sniper is amazing. But seriously, everyone always fights for the sniper, which is why once u get it, ur done. lockout is controlled mainly by BR and sword/shotgun.
.
What are you talking about? The sniper on Lockout, if used correctly, is extremley useful. You can be an average sniper, and still do well with it. Just keep moving from area to area. Make sure your back is covered and you've got an escape plan. Sniper could be as big a part of the map as sword.
sniper is wayyyyy more useful than sword on lockout. if you have the sniper and a team who can hold a br setup, by the time the other team can break your setup you will be too far ahead for them to catch up. Moving from area to area will get you killed, hold your setup, thats why you have teammates.
but i stil heavily favor midship over lockout. and warlock over lockout.
Yeah. I'll agree. Because the sword is the same in the hands of a noob as it is in an experienced player. Sniper. That's an infinate amount of skill to learn. You can always get better at it.. So if you have a good sniper. You're set.
[Edited on 08.23.2007 10:34 PM PDT]