- last post: 01.01.0001 12:00 AM PDT
Posted by: ZeroDefiance
They're important, no matter what any body says.
Oh look, its one of those awesome people who pretends that what he has to say is immensely more important than what anyone else has to say.
1v1's are NOT important. Of course, realistically, NO game of Halo is ACTUALLY important, but even within the confines of the game, 1v1's mean nothing. The other day, I was challenged to 3 1v1's after 3 seperate Rumble Pit games which I had won. The people challenging me had all finished in either 5th, 6th, or 7th. Two of them beat me. Does this mean they are better than me? No. It means that they can use a BR better than me. They were terrible snipers. They whored the sword and camped snipe tower - yeah, it was POSSIBLE to kill them, and I did a few times, but don't even try to say thats a fair game right there.
Anyone who has beaten me in 1v1, I can beat in a REAL game of Halo. A great 1v1 player is usually (not always, but usually) a bad team player. Button glitches only get you so far in a real game of Halo, and I for one am damn sick and tired of being called a noob because I can't defend a quadshot to the face. Big blamming deal, you can press buttons quickly.