Off Topic: The Flood
This topic has moved here: Subject: Harry Potter and the Prisoner of Suckaban.
  • Subject: Harry Potter and the Prisoner of Suckaban.
  • Pages:
  • 1
  • 2
  • of 2
Subject: Harry Potter and the Prisoner of Suckaban.
  • gamertag:
  • user homepage:
  • last post: 01.01.0001 12:00 AM PDT

Posted by: Xeroh
Harry pot head can go choke and die,i never liked the books and i dont like the movies. That little wich can rott in hell because hes scertainly not going to heaven!


See, this is fine with me, because while it's uneloquent and her grammar makes me ill, it's clearly personal opinion that is not attempted to be passed as fact.

  • 06.05.2004 7:20 PM PDT
  • gamertag:
  • user homepage:
  • last post: 01.01.0001 12:00 AM PDT

Don't get used to it.

  • 06.05.2004 7:23 PM PDT
  • gamertag:
  • user homepage:
  • last post: 01.01.0001 12:00 AM PDT

Posted by: Shishka
I like how the guy that demands that other opinions are to be respected is the same that opened this thread with what can be paraphrased as "if you liked this movie, you don't know crap."

Perhaps had he payed attention to the movie he wouldn't have had these problems. Ah well, I liked it.


Go Shishka, I liked it too.

  • 06.05.2004 7:35 PM PDT
  • gamertag: [none]
  • user homepage:

I'm sure as hell not praising anyone for a bad post.

  • 06.05.2004 7:36 PM PDT
  • gamertag:
  • user homepage:
  • last post: 01.01.0001 12:00 AM PDT

I was trying to say that in a very mocking tone, due to previous posts about my opinions, and how they were 'mine and mine only, and should be kept to myself'. You've seen my threads! My opinions always offend someone. I keep trying to tell them to get over it. I even post at the end of my threads not to respond! If they want to respond, and start arguing, fine. If their opinions are that MY opinions are wrong(which is the case alot), isn't that a bit hypocritical? So, in a sense, people who complain about my opinions are hypocrites in themselves, by not keeping theirs to themselves, and they don't realize it. And perhaps nor do you. Ugh.Forget this. I'm sick of fighting all the time with you, and just about everyone else. I'm putting in bold letters at the end of my threads not to respond unless they have something important to say, and might change my mind. You know, my mind is open. If people want to try to change my mind, and have a solid case, let them. But I'm not going be persuaded by 'keep your opinions to yourself'. Lock this if you feel it needs to be done.

  • 06.05.2004 7:40 PM PDT
  • gamertag:
  • user homepage:
  • last post: 01.01.0001 12:00 AM PDT

Harry Potter 3 is ok, but I really missed Chris Columbus directing. It didn't have the same vibe as the other two. It was ok but not what I expected after seeing what the first 2 was like. It was like the new director wanted this Harry Potter to be different, I can't stand most of the soundtrack. What's with the grainy film quality, is having bright colors in a movie not cool now. The cast still is good, the new Dumbledore is good but he's not Richard Harris. Its Ok, but now when someone asks me my least favorite HP movie I have an answer. I really hope they get a new director for the Goblet movie.

  • 06.05.2004 9:58 PM PDT
  • gamertag:
  • user homepage:
  • last post: 01.01.0001 12:00 AM PDT

I'd tell you what I think, but I'm starting more arguments.... even though I'm totally right!

  • 06.05.2004 10:00 PM PDT
  • gamertag:
  • user homepage:
  • last post: 01.01.0001 12:00 AM PDT

I meant I'm not starting more arguments. : )

  • 06.05.2004 10:01 PM PDT
  • gamertag:
  • user homepage:
  • last post: 01.01.0001 12:00 AM PDT

Posted by: GreenChief
Meh. What do you think about Harry Potter and the Prisoner of Suckaban? Like I care.

I think harry potter will end up comming outta the closent when they release the 12th installment

"Harry Potter and the little gerbil that changed my life"

Umm.. just say no. thanks.

  • 06.05.2004 10:16 PM PDT
  • gamertag:
  • user homepage:
  • last post: 01.01.0001 12:00 AM PDT

I agree the movi was jerky and skipped forward alot, and the dialouge was wooden

  • 06.06.2004 8:08 AM PDT
  • gamertag:
  • user homepage:
  • last post: 01.01.0001 12:00 AM PDT

It seems like it would be alot better then the first 2, but from wut u guys are saying....i guess not.

  • 06.06.2004 9:10 AM PDT
  • gamertag:
  • user homepage:
  • last post: 01.01.0001 12:00 AM PDT

WHY CAN PPL NOT GET IT IN THEIR HEADS? HARRY POTTER PLAIN SUCKS. GROW UP. READ LORD OF THE RINGS. READ MORE GROWN UP NOVELS. WATCH BETTER FILMS. THAT IS ALL I ASK, BUT NOT HARRY POTTER! Thank you.

  • 06.06.2004 12:10 PM PDT
  • gamertag:
  • user homepage:
  • last post: 01.01.0001 12:00 AM PDT

Shut up. Why don't you grow up? Lord of the Rings wasn't exactly best movie, ever material. Too lengthy, but detail was good. Music was good. Acting was ok, monsters were good(the big spider was kind of stupid). I'd give it a 9 out of possible 12. The books were boring as all Hell. And I've read all of Dostoyevsky's works. So that tells you something! The books recieve an 8 out of 12.

  • 06.06.2004 1:15 PM PDT

  • Pages:
  • 1
  • 2
  • of 2