- last post: 01.01.0001 12:00 AM PDT
Posted by: Flavor Flav
Posted by: Omphalism
Did I say ANYTHING negative about the moderators of this site? I dont think I did.
You said they were generally too inactive, and by recommending their number be increased, that they are incapable of doing a satisfactory job.
Incorrect. I attributed the problems not to the problems in their moderating, but instead I attributed it to the increase in membership. We all know the mods are working hard, but the fact is that the number of active members has increased dramatically.
I dont think they are forced to moderate, I said give incentive(sp?), meaning give them more of a reason to be here. Make it more easy, not force them to leave their wife and kids.
Then simply say that, and not just that they need to increase their activity. There are very few times that there a no moderators online.
I figured common sense would tell you that they shouldnt be active at the sake of their personal lives. I guess people dont realize having a life takes work.
You say there are enough mods in this thread, but youre complaining about the situation of spammed pictures in another thread. So which is it, should those pictures be allowed to stay up as long as they have been, or should we try to get more moderator activity?
I hold the members responsible for those actions at fault. Had they not done that, the moderators would not have had a need to lock those threads. To say that the members are not at fault for their actions, rather that the mods are responsible for their delay in removing them, is as illogical as it is stupid.
I have never said that it was the moderators fault they were up. I never said the mods were at fault for their existance, I said the lack of moderator activity was at fault for their time up. Dont try to twist my words to avoid the obvious point.
Wouldnt this fall under were I discussed making things easier on the mods? Mhmmm
The sheer hypocrisy of this is amazing. You constantly make alternate accounts and use them to bait people into flame wars. Sure you get the person banned, but that is only because you, yourself, decided they were detrimental to the forums.That is not for you to decide, and all you are doing is needlessly increasing the workload of the moderators.
I hate to say it ToP Chester, but hypocrasy isnt something you should bring up. Do you have any proof of any of this? No, so you are now trolling me, and throwing accusations towards me in order to get a negative response. Instead I will keep myself above your petty insults and mudslinging and stick to the facts. And the fact is that you are saying that I am an alternate account, when you were recently banned for racism on ToP Chester. Racism is the worst kind of offence IMO on this forum, and we both know you are guilty of it.
You seem to like making things seem less problematic than they are. I guarantee there are well over 5K active posters, especially when you consider the halo 3 forums. There are also far less than 27 active moderators.
As far as I know, there is only one person with moderator abilities who can be called inactive.
Some how I doubt that you know what you are talking about. Here are some links showing the last post by certain people with moderators. While they may have been on since then, I would hardly consider their status active.
goweb
Jeremiah
KPaul
MakaVeli4LIfe
Nosferatu_Soldie
running turtle
SketchFactor
Skiptrace
THE DON WAN
Now, before anyone gets the wrong idea. I am not talking about their activities in their jobs as many of these people are employed by bungie, I am instead showing him that the 27 people he refered to who were active in moderating, arnet active in moderating.
Also, you make things more problematic than they need to be, especially considering your association with the "Pezza incident".
Ahhh more accusations. Who do you think I am?
So, 1% of the forums. According to you thats only around 20-25 people. Somehow, I think the mods would disagree with that number if you asked them.
I said, "Most probably," based on what I have observed. I have no way of knowing how many people report threads/members. That was an assumption, nothing more.
And, youve been active here for how long? So either A. You have very limited observations, or B. You are an alt.
Either way, I doubt if you have talked to any moderators about this, while I have. Who better knows how many PMs the moderators get than the moderators themselves?
As for the issue of you trying to call me a banned user and imply that I have done things, of which you have no proof, I consider you a troll for that. MSN conversation logs are an amazing thing See this linkToPWNED