- last post: 01.01.0001 12:00 AM PDT
Posted by: AwmSlugger
Well i disagree with all you guys. GTA i think deserved it. San Andreas of all the other GTA games is soo much better. The whole story is better and everything is. I agree the san andereas one becuase it is a kick ass game. And also Halo2 campaign kind of sucked. It was not what i was expecting. So good job GTA for winning game of the year.
Grammer, my friend, grammer.
I, personally, am in a state of unbalance with the decision. To look at the facts: GTA has a much longer storyline, much longer playing time, and decent graphics. Overall, a very good game.
On the other hand, Halo 2 has mind-blowing graphics (for a console), a short storyline and playing time, but most importantly, Halo 2 has online play. Not only that, but Halo 2 revolutionized online play to a new level. This makes people come back for more and more until the next installation in the series (but GTA 3 and Vice City also had the same effect with their single player campaigns.)
I believe San Andreas has its single player campaign and Halo 2 has its multiplayer. The deciding vote all came down to how many fans each game had that voted. If it was just a panel of judges voting, it would be way too close to call in my opinion.