- last post: 01.01.0001 12:00 AM PDT
I can think of a few reasons why it would be better to set the 50 cap at a no limit cap.
1. It would tell us whom the best players are in the proper order. , , ." World chess federation is a great example" We know WHO the best player is.
2.It would make it a fairer system, , people starting to play halo now are at a big disadvantage.
3. It would make room for all of us to move,,, Thats what this thread is about,, people complaining about not moving up after winning a few games.
get rid of the 50 cap and you would see your progress, at the minute its happening so slow its like watching hair grow.
4. You would have an equal balance of skill level, meaning a 30 skill would be relative to a 40 skill. At the minute a 30 could beat a 40 no problem.
5.And the most important thing is that it would be the top players that would be spread out past the 50 skill, it would not effect us that much but to give a better picture of our true skill .And give us all ROOM to move up and down the skill levels with ease .At the minute to reach 50 skill you have to be BETTER
than a 50 skiller, because you have to win on a regular basis against these players.
Remove the cap and a 30 would beat a 40 less rarely. Giving you a truer skill reading.
And as for becoming general, i think that whole thing should be scraped.. The ranks do not work only for bragging rights.
And i would recommend after getting killed in h3, The respawn clock should be increased to 10 seconds, at the minute no one cares about getting killed
as long as they clock up there points by killing as many as possible without giving a toss about there own possible death.
This takes away alot of tactics that could be used if the spawn clock was set higher. Making it a more realistic strategic game.
[Edited on 11.22.2007 9:02 AM PST]