- last post: 01.01.0001 12:00 AM PDT
hahaha no more shotty wh0r3s he says,yeah but now theres sword wh0r3s and people still run for the most powerfull weapons to win the game such as sword,rocket launcher,sniper or beam rifel,heh and the dual wielding dosnt change any thing its just first shot first kill as always.
Posted by: BoxMonster13
Yes I'm a fan of both. I like both for different reason, but I think I am the first person to find fault with Halo 1. When we used to play System Link on H1, it would always turn into a pistol sniping, shotty wielding fest. People would pusposefully run to these weapons just to win. Now in Halo 2, there are many different ways to fight, and the shotty was powered down to keep clumping shotty wh0r3s from ruling a board. Also, no more pistol, which everyone knows was overpowered, even if they don't want to admit it. The new diversity of weapons and dual wielding feature enable people to fight many different ways, instead of the cliche shotty and pistol combo. I think that Bungie did good by Halo 2, by reducing cheapness by the balancing out the weapons and adding more variety to the first games meager selection. What do you guys think? And if you are just going to complain about Halo2, please don't post, I want this to be a constructive criticism/suggestion/support topic, not a bon fire like many other topics have turned into.