- Tyguy101
- |
- Exalted Legendary Member
Reach MMO. Here's to hoping.
And the people that believe "the hardcore playlists would be more popular if the rules were strictly MLG" can come off it, now. If you're not willing to support something close to your own setup, there's no reason for us to believe that cloning our own lists and stripping the variety down will attract more people. -- Shishka, Bungie.net
Posted by: JBSpudster
Posted by: Karl2177
Predator Eagle: Member Since: 05.03.2008: Heroic Member: ? bans, ? warning(s).
Pro Kendog: Member Since: 01.02.2008: Honorable Legendary Member: ? bans, ? warning(s).
Killermario16: Member Since: 08.02.2008: Heroic Member: ? bans, ? warning(s).
Karl2177: Member Since: 01.16.2008: Honorable Member: 0 bans, 1 warning(s).
Eliper: Member Since: 12.09.2008: Intrepid Heroic Member: ? bans, ? warning(s).
Old Papa Rich: Member Since: 10.05.2007: Noble Legendary Member: ? bans, ? warning(s).
Tyguy101: Member Since: 08.30.2005: Exalted Heroic Member: ? bans, ? warning(s).
z ZUMA z: Member Since: 07.26.2008: Honorable Member: ? bans, ? warning(s).
WTF? Member join dates have little effect on the system, besides your prefix.
Edit: I should change this into a spreadsheet to filter the information by join date, bans, etc...
I would have to disagree. You are trying to explain a multi-layered system by only taking a look at one aspect of it through a very small sample size. There could be an abundant amount of reasons why your sample size didn't show a correlation between join dates and base titles.
This is very strange info that you have sampled, and it is completely in contradiction to the original post in many ways. I'm not sure the OP really has any idea or is even close to the reason people get promoted or demoted.
My case is a perfect example. I have been an active member for over 4 years! With zero bans/warnings. Heroic, by his definition, makes zero sense.
Also there is no rhyme or reason to my demotion as well.