Bungie.net Community
This topic has moved here: Subject: FAQ on Bungie.net Member Titles / Prefixes / Bar Colors
  • Subject: FAQ on Bungie.net Member Titles / Prefixes / Bar Colors
Subject: FAQ on Bungie.net Member Titles / Prefixes / Bar Colors

"Why concentrate on the negative when we can speak of the positive?"
My File Share
Try using the Search Bar next time.
Halo 2 was the best Halo game
A7x FoREVer!


Posted by: OMARRCHR
I'm seeing a ton of new members with the Legendary title, but not any (if any) new Mythic members. I'm assuming that there's still a cap on how many members can have Mythic?

If it means anything I got my Mythic title back a few days ago, after loosing it for 4-5 months due to a warning and a ban.

  • 09.06.2011 10:46 AM PDT

"You build on failure. You use it as a stepping stone. Close the door on the past. You don't try to forget the mistakes, but you don't dwell on it. You don't let it have any of your energy, or any of your time, or any of your space." -Johnny Cash


Posted by: Noshotskill

Posted by: OMARRCHR
I'm seeing a ton of new members with the Legendary title, but not any (if any) new Mythic members. I'm assuming that there's still a cap on how many members can have Mythic?

If it means anything I got my Mythic title back a few days ago, after loosing it for 4-5 months due to a warning and a ban.

Not really, I'm just talking about new Mythics. I'm assuming that it's easier to regain a title than earn one.

  • 09.06.2011 10:51 AM PDT

The distance between insanity and genius is measured only by success.

OTK

I need your clothes, your boots and your mobility scooter


Posted by: Swamptik

Posted by: ian1706
My account is 2 years old tomorrow.

I think i will be promoted to...Member.


Lol. Just stay active and have fun on the site. It's a great place for people to poke good natured fun at one-another, talk about Halo, talk about stuff. You know. The usual.
Yeah i know, it's just i have a ban every now and then :/ I'll go months without one and then just as i come close to a title, i'll do something stupid.

  • 09.06.2011 11:02 AM PDT

DEATHPIMP72 R.I.P 10/14/2011
(m)

"I'm going to destroy you" -necktatpat

I flickered Mythic for a couple days at the end of August. Pretty weird and a total tease. :|

  • 09.06.2011 11:37 AM PDT

I came, I saw, I conquered. On my quest to become Mythic. So all can be jealous of the amazing blue glow from my title bar. =) ~BlindChild~


Posted by: Shurshacker
I flickered Mythic for a couple days at the end of August. Pretty weird and a total tease. :|
it means your close!

  • 09.06.2011 12:53 PM PDT

I'll make your girl do backflips.
The WorkPLace

Posted by: Shurshacker
I flickered Mythic for a couple days at the end of August. Pretty weird and a total tease. :|

I've been this title for a grip!

  • 09.06.2011 1:11 PM PDT

only the best game ever.
~Sur Squishy
XBL: D a r k s t a r
PSN: darkstarrr
Minecraft: The_Dark_Star

Forum Rules | Terms of Use | Code of Conduct

Posted by: Shurshacker
I flickered Mythic for a couple days at the end of August. Pretty weird and a total tease. :|

If you continue to be active and hold your PPD at the point that it is at, you should get it rather soon?

  • 09.06.2011 1:15 PM PDT

Wake me, when you need me.


Posted by: Shurshacker
I flickered Mythic for a couple days at the end of August. Pretty weird and a total tease. :|
That is most likely because your PPD is extremely low. Log in everyday, and make at least 5 posts per day. If you do that for a couple more weeks, you'll prob jump up to Mythic at the beginning of october.

  • 09.06.2011 2:01 PM PDT
  • gamertag: [none]
  • user homepage:


Posted by: Noshotskill

Posted by: OMARRCHR
I'm seeing a ton of new members with the Legendary title, but not any (if any) new Mythic members. I'm assuming that there's still a cap on how many members can have Mythic?

If it means anything I got my Mythic title back a few days ago, after loosing it for 4-5 months due to a warning and a ban.


I remember that. Congrats.

  • 09.06.2011 2:03 PM PDT

If this is the state of my art, then I secede.

I WANT MY LEGENDARY BACK! :(

and then I remembered, green/blue/grey is way better than solid grey anyway.

[Edited on 09.06.2011 2:32 PM PDT]

  • 09.06.2011 2:32 PM PDT
  •  | 
  • Senior Mythic Member

"You are the diction, not me!"

The Spectagon

Grizzled Newborn

Posted by: UnderTheKnif3
I WANT MY LEGENDARY BACK! :(

LOL

  • 09.06.2011 2:39 PM PDT

DEATHPIMP72 R.I.P 10/14/2011
(m)

"I'm going to destroy you" -necktatpat

Ima hang wif necktatpat at Legendary as long as possible.

(m)

  • 09.06.2011 4:00 PM PDT

On a more serious note, the last time you got a PM was Christmas of 2010?

On an even more serious note, that person was the Disembodied Soul?
:P
Posted by: HipiO7
Posted by: Kickimanjaro
Posted by: HipiO7
Where is mah Mythic, goddamnit?! Should have it by now.

xD

Over my cold grey title bar!

In all seriousness, if you've remained active since the moment you made your account you could get Mythic very soon. Also beware that "if you get warned/banned you can still achieve a title, but it will take longer."


Then this cant be good, right?

  • 09.06.2011 4:05 PM PDT

Clear eyes, full hearts, can't lube.

Heroic was flickering up near the end of August, but now it won't even show up anymore.

And yes, I've been keeping my PPD up.

  • 09.06.2011 4:47 PM PDT

“Oh, it’s a little bit of everything, it’s the mountains, it’s the fog, it’s the news at six o’clock, it’s the death of my first dog, it’s the angels up above me, it’s the song that they don’t sing, It’s a little bit of everything.”
- Dawes, A little bit of everything


Posted by: ctjl96
On a more serious note, the last time you got a PM was Christmas of 2010?

On an even more serious note, that person was the Disembodied Soul?
:P
Posted by: HipiO7
Posted by: Kickimanjaro
Posted by: HipiO7
Where is mah Mythic, goddamnit?! Should have it by now.

xD

Over my cold grey title bar!

In all seriousness, if you've remained active since the moment you made your account you could get Mythic very soon. Also beware that "if you get warned/banned you can still achieve a title, but it will take longer."


Then this cant be good, right?

Perhaps he deletes his Private Messages.

  • 09.06.2011 4:49 PM PDT

Reach fails as a game.

Get jealous.

I just got Honorable, yet I had a Warning in January earlier this year.

What is this I don't even.

  • 09.06.2011 8:22 PM PDT

"We live in a special time; the only time where we can observationally verify that we live in a very special time" - Lawrence Krauss.

I was a finalist :P

I posted this a while ago- but it was lost in the amass of posts so I decided to post it to get more feedback

Lets assume that, the total points earned for a day for a single user is given by X(Day-Total).

X(Day) = V + PPD + ln[(t)(f)PPD] - [(B)^n + (W)][0]

V
A fixed value which is given when a user logs on.

PPD
Is the posts made by the user on a given day, the more posts and activity, the higher your trust value will go up.

ln[(t)(f)PPD]
Is the time you are online on Bungie.net for a given day, X. It is given in hours and is multiplied by 'PPD' and a constant 'f' (<1). The result is then natural logged.
The reason for this is that it cannot be abused by just leaving a users Laptop and/or Computer online, while they are away- because they do not post.
Example:
Time online: 10 hours, PPD: 0 then
(t)(f)PPD= 10(f)(0) = 0 (that is you will get zero trust points for the time you are on without posting). Note: ln does not apply if (t)(f)PPD = 0 (because ln(0) = undefined)

[(B)^n + (W)][0]
B and W are variable constants which depend on the type of ban and/or warnings a user has. 'n' represents the number days of the ban. The reason the '0' is part of this section of the equation is such that, if a user is not banned and/or warned, they are not penalised as the zero then applies.


Now comes equation 2. Achronos' has stated (in one of the links provided by Duardo) that you are compared the highest user and you move up in accordance.

g(X(Highest) - X(Day))= Q (for X(Day) > 0)

The above equation does not apply if you fall negative. If you are the highest user for the day, your X(Day) doubles. 'g' is another constant <1

Hence:
X(Day Total)= Q + X(Day)

Now let D1 = X(Day 1 Total), D2= X(Day 2 Total), ....

X(Overall) = (D1 + D2 + ...... + D(X))^a - (B^n(total) + W(total))

'a' represents some progression constant which goes up more and more per day you do not get warned or banned. It resets once you do

Again this is just my idea, and it is most likely wrong. Any ideas to improve it? I posted this a few days ago- but I would like some more feedback.

Notes
'f' and 'g' are constants which are important to the equations.

Take 'f': If it does not exist there would be to great a value for trust points in a given day, if one posts a lot and is online a whole heap.

Take 'g': If it is not applied, then the amount of trust points for the day = trust points of the highest earner.



[Edited on 09.06.2011 8:44 PM PDT]

  • 09.06.2011 8:30 PM PDT

I remember when I used this space to put cool looking links to my chapters back in the day. I don't even know why I'm using it now. Why are you even reading this? You must be interested in me. Still reading?

Posted by: Zealot Tony
I really enjoyed reading over your theory. I found a bit of a problem with the first theory though. Time online: 10 hours, PPD: 0 then
(t)(f)PPD= 10(f)(0) = 0 (that is you will get zero trust points for the time you are on without posting). Note: ln does not apply if (t)(f)PPD = 0 (because ln(0) = undefined)

I would believe a very minimal amount of trust points would be received for simply logging in. It is, technically, keeping your account active, posting or not. Even if it is just 1 trust point, it's more than 0.

[Edited on 09.06.2011 8:36 PM PDT]

  • 09.06.2011 8:35 PM PDT

"We live in a special time; the only time where we can observationally verify that we live in a very special time" - Lawrence Krauss.

I was a finalist :P


Posted by: American Recoil
Posted by: Zealot Tony
I really enjoyed reading over your theory. I found a bit of a problem with the first theory though. Time online: 10 hours, PPD: 0 then
(t)(f)PPD= 10(f)(0) = 0 (that is you will get zero trust points for the time you are on without posting). Note: ln does not apply if (t)(f)PPD = 0 (because ln(0) = undefined)

I would believe a very minimal amount of trust points would be received for simply logging in. It is, technically, keeping your account active, posting or not. Even if it is just 1 trust point, it's more than 0.

True. Maybe I should add another variable to the eqaution, which gives you a fixed amount of trust points for logging on.

  • 09.06.2011 8:38 PM PDT

I remember when I used this space to put cool looking links to my chapters back in the day. I don't even know why I'm using it now. Why are you even reading this? You must be interested in me. Still reading?

Posted by: Zealot Tony

Posted by: American Recoil
Posted by: Zealot Tony
I really enjoyed reading over your theory. I found a bit of a problem with the first theory though. Time online: 10 hours, PPD: 0 then
(t)(f)PPD= 10(f)(0) = 0 (that is you will get zero trust points for the time you are on without posting). Note: ln does not apply if (t)(f)PPD = 0 (because ln(0) = undefined)

I would believe a very minimal amount of trust points would be received for simply logging in. It is, technically, keeping your account active, posting or not. Even if it is just 1 trust point, it's more than 0.

True. Maybe I should add another variable to the eqaution, which gives you a fixed amount of trust points for logging on.
Precisely. The 'f' variable is the only part I would tinker with. But like I said, very interesting theory.

  • 09.06.2011 8:40 PM PDT

Does anyone even read these?

when will i be mythix guise?

  • 09.06.2011 9:01 PM PDT

I remember when I used this space to put cool looking links to my chapters back in the day. I don't even know why I'm using it now. Why are you even reading this? You must be interested in me. Still reading?

Posted by: BadBall3r47
when will i be mythix guise?
nevar :(

  • 09.06.2011 9:04 PM PDT

Posted by: Dustin 6047
Troll confirmed. I never even insulted you

Posted by: Dustin 6047
OP - You're a dumbass with the reading comprehension skills of a second grader.


Can someone tell me what's wrong with these two, this made me LOL hard.


Posted by: BadBall3r47
when will i be mythix guise?
What happened to Fabled? :(

  • 09.06.2011 9:06 PM PDT

Does anyone even read these?

Too cool for it.

  • 09.07.2011 1:02 AM PDT