- sesquipadelian
- |
- Exalted Mythic Member
etc etc/glaringly obvious/and so on, and such <=Not redundant!
Posted by: Cr4ne Style
Taxes do nothing to affect the share of wealth, since taxes are only applied to income.
So that's not even a part of the conversation at all, so it's pointless talking about it....
"for a "best" moral to exist, there must exist the "best" moral base. If the base of morality varies from location to location, culture to culture...then there can't be an absolute moral..
what is a 'VS" thread?
you brought up how people post about alt accounts. this can be done in ways that are personal attacks, and it can be done in ways that do not. if you see someone say negative things about a user, then you can report the post and it will be looked at. this goes for all forms of personal attacks, and it applies to personal attacks that apply to accounts that are called alt accounts. but, simply mentioning that a specific brand new account with loads of activity has all of the trappings of an alt account hardly seems like a personal attack.
let's imagine that i make posts every day defending the rank system and various settings in team hardcore. then i get banned on 1/20, and i am not able to post. if on 1/20 a brand new account with no gamertag linked pops up with the name 'foot and a halflong word' pops up and continues along the exact same lines and argues all of the same points in all of the same threads, it might look suspicious. now let's suppose that 'foot and a half long word' gets banned on 1/23, and on 1/23 a brand new alt account pops up with no gamertag linked with the name 'very long word', and does the same stuff. now, on 1/27, after a 7 day ban, my account gets the ban lifted, and all of a sudden the activity of the other two accounts stops entirely, and they remain inactive until my account gets banned, and then the cycle continues.
do you think that it would be a personal attack to mention that 'foot and a half long word' and 'very long word' look like alt accounts?