- last post: 01.01.0001 12:00 AM PDT
Posted by: Batzter
*I was blacklisted for condemning the 2 girls 1 cup video on topic in a thread that was repediatly spammed to the top by others. These other people got away with it though because they werent replying on topic. How can it be ok to spam a thing to the top but not saying that "this is wrong".
Thats one
*Ive been blacklisted by supporting the OP when the rest of the people in a 5 page thread flamed him. All the flames made one of the mods decide that the entire thread was spam and blacklisted everyone who had replied. How can you decide after 5 pages that the topic is spam? You dont get to decide what the topic is based on the replies, that would require 6th sense members who knew when it was safe to reply and not. I dont know what the person after me is going to post, well in this particular case I got a feeling of whats to come.
Thats two
One mod just warned me for replying to a post that was in the wrong place,. IT WAS IN THE WRONG PLACE, that doesnt make it spam and you can not warn me based on that im replying to spam when im not.
Thats three
...and im out for good. Ive been a member of many sites since the late 90´s and this is by far the most incosistent, Im not a freaking mind reader. Implementing member titles just adds to the stupidity since you know damn well that not all of the mods are judging things the same way and that this might affect some members while others are repediatly moving under the radar. What are they there for? Every time the subject is brought up everyone's claiming that people shouldnt be treated differently due to their titles so what the hell are they good for? The majority of the people who has them are those who are only posting ttwice per year anyway.
Yeah you can close this now and throw in a BL while you´re at it.
-1-
I suppose vigilantes never get the respect they deserve. Like the smear campaign against Spider-Man by the Daily Bugle.