- baghead X
- |
- Exalted Member
Posted by: eraseme
Posted by: Finigan
Posted by: kmndt_Klink
Alright bungie, gg on making sidewinder, I honestly would have preffered a completely new map considering im paying another 10$, i dont suppose you would consider maybe NOT making so many huge maps, maybe some smaller close quarters ones, to, you know increase the total to like 2. That remake of zanzibar was disappointing, but it looks like this one shouldn't be. The only remake i would want to see is lockout. thats it.
Regarding not needing a new BTB battle map, I think I can disagree with you there...the current Big Team Battle map consists of 3 maps (I'm not exaggerating here, either) whereas the play lists for smaller maps is much larger....although I don't know what you would call "close quaters" map. After all is said and done we should have 5 big maps opposed to the 3 we have now, which is good....and there is no saying the last of the 3 new maps won't be really small. We haven't even seen the 3rd one yet. I suspect that it should round out the map list nicely.
big maps suitable for btb? try valhalla, sandtrap, last resort, standoff, and now this remake.
small maps? guardian and foundry. snowbound doesnt count as a map, snowbounds a tunnel with 3 shield doors spaced at even intervals.
try epitaph
ok it sucks balls but it's small so don't complain
the just need to adjust the weapon placement (sniper instead of rockets and flamer instead of shotty)
oh and there's foundry too
anyway, we need more small AND more huge maps
what we DEFINITELY don't need are medium maps like construct, the pit or isolation
so bungie, how about making 2 small 1 big map in this mappack, as there were 2 big 1 small in the last one
next one can be 2 big 1 small again and after that you can continue making 1 small, 1 medium and 1 huge map per pack