- last post: 01.01.0001 12:00 AM PDT
Posted by: Ender
Posted by: Liton
Posted by: Ender
So, you too are saying that time is only relative.
it's hard to explain, but it's the truth. Look at time as artificial, there is no past. Just focus at the concept of time, and exentually, the intelligent, will understand it is purely manmade, there is no past, just something that hapened, there is just movement.
It's not a theory, it's a fact.
I have three words for you. Zeno of Elea. Zeno was a greek philosopher and mathematician in ancient greece. He stated that travel through time is nonexistant. That there is only ever one point in time at any given moment. Take this for example:
An arrow is released into the air toward a tree. Now stop time. The arrow is in one place. It is always a measurable distance from the tree. The arrow is always in one place in space and time.
Now, he is correct. You're trying to take it one step further by saying that it was never in a different spot than what it is currently in. However, you're acting as if time is a spacial dimension(length, width, height, etc.), however, time is a temporal dimension that is not linear as spacial dimensions are. It follows different rules. As space is always measured in positive numbers, but time can be measured in negatives because it has passed and is no longer in the present.
well, yes, let me correct myself, the past is existant, but untouchable, yet in reality there is no trace to it, except for the theory of wormholes, which is like a chute in time, I beleive if there is any past travel, that's it.