- last post: 01.01.0001 12:00 AM PDT
Heyyo,
Try getting rid of you ancient pc, and get a good one, then you'll see the better graphics, you m$ sellouts. Gj on that, you're officially Bill Gate's lapdogs, doing his bidding, and doing something else that pleasures him so, but I shall not say on these forums. So ya fell for the m$ tap, you believe a 5 year old console is better than a state-of-the-art pc, and you also believe that the lack of coop is cause computers can't handle it... you dolts. Serious Sam 2 can go up to 16 player coop, with over 100 monsters attacking you.. I'd like to see a console pull that off and not die like Halo2 for $box does... I tried it, and wow, framerate dies down a lot, but hey, what can you expect from a new game being hindered by an old console? :)
BTW, Half Life 2: 60 players, most realistic graphics, incredible framerates (I get over 50 fames/second) and support for older systems, lots of modding capabilities, and computer controlled multiplayer opponents.
Halo2: 16 players, somewhat cartoonish settings and character looks, 30 framerate max, has to support an old console (lol), modding of game and/or $box is illegal and will stop you from playing online, and no computer controlled opponents.
No wonder everyone says Half Life 2's the greatest game of the year, and all that's left of Halo2 was the hype that diddn't live up to the game.
http://www.megagames.com/news/html/pc/andthewinneris.shtml
Half Life 2: first place
Halo 2: 6th place.
http://www.spiketv.com/events/vga2004/
Yet again: Half Life 2 > Halo 2. PC Games built for PC's shall forever dominate over Console games. Now, run back to your console, and your precious "autoaim" since you have no skills.
PC > $box. PC Games > $box games.
PC > $box > j00 the $box f00l.