- last post: 01.01.0001 12:00 AM PDT
Posted by: Maxe3
Damn, i could write you a book on that one.
- Better maps
- Faster gameplay
- Less weapons/grenades = faster and more skill-based gameplay
- Better physics
etc...etc....etc...Yes, because a game is obviously inferior or less fun when it's slower-paced, duh. Why even bother playing with Chess? It's quite slow-paced and boring compared to Checkers. :D
Halo 2's severe auto-aim and game imbalances are the developers' sins which should not be ignored or misinterpreted. Yeah, I'm not a big fan of all the redundancy that others claim to be variety and Halo 3's inconsistencies, but in terms of death match, it takes more skill.
Posted by: Maxe3
Sure, Halo 3 is nice, more realistic, have less bugs and so on. But i don't play Halo 2 to kill others in a "realistic" way. I play Halo 2 becuase everything flows. From the second i moved on Cairo Station I was in love. =/Yeah, uh, millions of other people haven't experienced the Halo franchise for realism either. I thought we threw realism out the window when we were fighting against alien civilizations with shotguns that have a distance of three yards.
[Edited on 05.26.2008 5:21 AM PDT]