- kalle90
- |
- Intrepid Mythic Member
1.Arkham Asylum, 2.Mass Effect, 3.Halo CE, 4.Mass Effect 2, 5.Halo 2, 6.Splinter Cell Double Agent, 7.Gears of War 2, 8.Medievil, 9.Oblivion, 10.Crash Team Racing
Posted by: fiagra
Posted by: Dibhousai
I dont understand what your saying because you didnt say anything pertinent. All you said was Auto aim and strafe = skill which is wrong since even less auto aim (halo3) would be harder to control and therefore take more skill to get the kill since your putting more effort into it.. your argument is broken, and your not good at Halo 3 so you naysay
Less auto-aim makes it easier to aim on your own, although that may not be true for every one, but its sure true for me. I am good at halo 3, and i suck at halo 2, but according to your logic I should be better at halo 2? Considering you think auto aim = less skill?
You fail, get out of my thread. No morons allowed.
You aim yourself, you move yourself, you think yourself= You are doing the match, you are good or bad, it's all you and the others.
Do you think Halo3 should have automatical hand shaking like in some war games? And other factors that aren't dependant of players like random airstrikes and such. That's like biased referfee in hockey, you need more skill to win when he is sided with opponent, but it isn't natural event.
Halo2 requires different things Halo3 does. They are as skillful in a sense as the better player wins most of the time. Halo3 is more weapon variety and Halo2 is more BR and power weapons. Halo2 is less about aiming, more about the moving.
The best player of all FPS always wins without any assists or randomizers.
I can win Formula1 races without assists, but lose with assists on, is that because I'm weak?