- last post: 01.01.0001 12:00 AM PDT
Posted by: Armeddragon77
um, i think you have things backwards. Halo 2's battle rifle is ridiculously powerful, and the sniper is alot easier to use. Not to mention BXB/BXB those just make the game ridiculous and takes much less skill then halo 3 Yes, yes that would be true...except from the LITTLE fact that the OTHER players you play against ALSO have those. How thick-headed are you people? Would Halo 3 require less skill if they added more Auto-aim?
If we would listen to everyone one of you who actually belives you can "rate" the "skill" needed to master a game, Halo 2 would be hardest, by far. Why? Well, as this gentleman said. The OTHER players (yes, you actually play against OTHER living creatures, omg? Yeah.), the other players have a "ridiculously powerful" BR in their hands, the have an "easy to kill with" sniper, and not to mention all of those 1hitKO button glitches.
See what i just did? I just added another number to your cute little equation.
You guys don't even seem to remeber that you actually play against OTHERS in MP. Sure, in campaign, Halo 2 is a sleepwalk, but this seems to be pretty MP focused. Whatever "overpowered" move/weapon you give to the "player", every other "player" else also gets.
So tell me now, how does Halo 2, that offers you enemies with: Great aim, overpowered weapons, button glitches, and ever other stupid thing you've metioned about H2, how does THOSE enemies require less skill to kill?
And i'm not even picking a side, i'm just telling you how much math you would have to do before you could actually come to the correct answer. What I think is that this topic is filled with people who suck at Halo 3 (me here), versus people who suck at Halo 2, and they aaaall want to have it confirmed that their skills are the "best".
How sad isn't that? Let's just say Halo CE requires most skill, would that make you shut up?