- xPanncakez
- |
- Noble Member
- gamertag: [none]
- user homepage:
Posted by: TheBeast51293
I don't think these two guns are comparable.
The Br is primary used for mid to long range battle.
Where as the AR is used for close quarters.
If you know how to play the game, you will never try to kill someone across the map with the AR, and if you are intelligent, you will never try to BR someone extremely close to you.
I think if you had to compare two weapons, it should be the BR/Carbine.
Or the AR/PR.
It hard to compare to things that are used completely different.
It is like deciding if an ipod or cellphone is better. It is an invalid argument because they are used for different uses.
Agreed. The AR is more close-quarters, while the BR was meant for mid-long range combat. Nonetheless, the BR is used more anyways. I'm having a difficult time understanding why people say, "Oh, the AR is such a noob weapon. It's way too over powered," though, or that it's easy to use. I personally find that the AR is harder to use in most instances since it has a more limited window of use. The BR is easier to use once you know how to aim for the head, which doesn't take that long. A 4-shot is extremely effective, and could kill very quickly, whereas the AR's shot takes a longer time to kill.