Halo 2 Forum
This topic has moved here: Subject: New, Beefed up foreunners
  • Subject: New, Beefed up foreunners
  • Pages:
  • 1
  • 2
  • of 2
Subject: New, Beefed up foreunners
  • gamertag:
  • user homepage:
  • last post: 01.01.0001 12:00 AM PDT

Posted by: Rickjames-blam!-
yeah, but all these theories about the forerunners and stuff are annoying and not true and go way to far

Some are way out there, some seem so only because they draw upon the information in the novels. My personal pet theory is pretty far out there as well, describing what the Flood are and why they were created and just what went wrong.

  • 06.30.2004 8:42 AM PDT
  • gamertag:
  • user homepage:
  • last post: 01.01.0001 12:00 AM PDT

wow, someone actually used catharsis in a description of a videogame. and i'm not being sarcastic and mean and im not making fun of them. and no, i don't think hte forerunners were huge. i thinkk the point about cathedrals were very good. and besides, it's only certain doors that are huge.

[Edited on 6/30/2004 8:45:27 AM]

  • 06.30.2004 8:44 AM PDT
  • gamertag:
  • user homepage:
  • last post: 01.01.0001 12:00 AM PDT

You guys are probably right, the sentinels were probably not meant for fighting. They (sentinels) were just to weak for such a powerful civilization. I imagine that if MC visits another forerunner site (i.e another halo) he will find some very dangerous foreunner technology....that would be kinda of cool to fight!

[Edited on 6/30/2004 8:57:03 AM]

  • 06.30.2004 8:56 AM PDT
  • gamertag:
  • user homepage:
  • last post: 01.01.0001 12:00 AM PDT

Hopefully bungie will make the sentinels (or equivelant) harder in halo2. They killed me only once in the game.

I was playing "The Maw" on legendary and was trying to destroy the fusion reactors. I fell off the platform you have to stand on and ended up with only one peice of health. I ran for the health packs but i was eventualy killed by a sentinel. I almost made it. That's how weak they are, they can just barely kill you on the hard difficulty with low health.

  • 06.30.2004 9:07 AM PDT
  • gamertag:
  • user homepage:
  • last post: 01.01.0001 12:00 AM PDT

Sentinals and forruners are two different things, jeez, sentinal su*ked anyway

  • 06.30.2004 9:09 AM PDT
  • gamertag:
  • user homepage:
  • last post: 01.01.0001 12:00 AM PDT

Posted by: Fatalsnipe9
Sentinals and forruners are two different things, jeez, sentinal su*ked anyway

That was his point, that Forerunner technology looked pretty weak when you had Sentinels for an example.

  • 06.30.2004 9:13 AM PDT
  • gamertag:
  • user homepage:
  • last post: 01.01.0001 12:00 AM PDT

o ok i was like are you kidding me with this post. In that case i think the sentinals would need to be a little bit stronger

  • 06.30.2004 9:17 AM PDT
  • gamertag:
  • user homepage:
  • last post: 01.01.0001 12:00 AM PDT

I wasn't saying sentinels are forerunners, fatalsnipe9.

  • 06.30.2004 9:19 AM PDT
  • gamertag:
  • user homepage:
  • last post: 01.01.0001 12:00 AM PDT

I don't think the Sentinels were combative. I think they were instead repair drones drafted into service to fight the Flood by Guilty Spark.

Look at Guilty Spark instead, now *he* was created to take a beating.

  • 06.30.2004 9:19 AM PDT
  • gamertag:
  • user homepage:
  • last post: 01.01.0001 12:00 AM PDT

I think 343gs is invincable because he is important to the storyline....I don't think he is actualy unbeatable. Imagine how it would mess up the last levels if you shot him with the shotgun in "The library".

  • 06.30.2004 9:45 AM PDT

  • Pages:
  • 1
  • 2
  • of 2