- last post: 01.01.0001 12:00 AM PDT
Posted by: Andz Jones
Well, as title suggests, and the books, and with rumours that the games longer than Halo, i think we're not going to destroy the flood totally, as that means no more sequels (thankk god!)
Maybe if you wrote it a bit more coherently we'd know what the hell you're talking about.
Why does destroying the flood = no more sequels? And why is that a good thing!?!? Also, what does the title (of Halo 2?) and the books suggest? Be a bit more clear, please...