Bungie.net Community
This topic has moved here: Subject: Forum update?
  • Subject: Forum update?
Subject: Forum update?

If you want to join in on the most fascinating and beneficial group on Bungie.Net, come and join Black Water Ops, Most active group on B.Net (FACT)

Posted by: EAGLES5
Posted by: SCOTTY OWNS U
Do members with alot of ban history get a title?


impurity member?

Just a thought
I think they might get the intrepid member, i don't know much about it exactly.

  • 11.13.2008 7:08 PM PDT
  • gamertag: [none]
  • user homepage:

***Aberrant Designs***

Finished the fight on September 26,2007, 10:49pm EST
Remembered Reach on September 15th, 2010 9:30pm EST

Whatever the missing rank, it's gotta be the highest =/

  • 11.13.2008 7:10 PM PDT

If you want to join in on the most fascinating and beneficial group on Bungie.Net, come and join Black Water Ops, Most active group on B.Net (FACT)

Posted by: A Deaf Boy
Whatever the missing rank, it's gotta be the highest =/
if it were to be the highest, that title should be something like in the category of "Master" maybe.

For example, Master Heroic member.

  • 11.13.2008 7:13 PM PDT
  • gamertag: [none]
  • user homepage:

“To say more would spoil be it’s overall its a game that needs to be played.” - Aristotle

Posted by: iTz da ArBiTeR
I think they might get the intrepid member, i don't know much about it exactly.
Achronos said that it's determined by how active you are in the public and private forums, although he did not specify if there were any other factors.

Which could make me suck, or could make me sweet. I am unsure. Although Intrepid does seem to be somewhat of a rare thing.

[Edited on 11.13.2008 7:15 PM PST]

  • 11.13.2008 7:14 PM PDT
  •  | 
  • Fabled Mythic Member

R.I.P. DeathPimp. Never Ending Respect.

"Posted by: Kickimanjaro
I'm trying to become an '04, but it's not working too well."

Posted by: A Deaf Boy
Whatever the missing rank, it's gotta be the highest =/


Maybe i'll have said rank.

I've been here a long time.
I've posted A TON.
I've been demoted from mythic 2 times?
i've been banned 2 times recently in my 4 year history.

jeez. i just hate being so.... plain

  • 11.13.2008 7:14 PM PDT
  • gamertag: [none]
  • user homepage:

I HAZ FLAMIN RECONZ!1!1!1!!!!!1!!11!1!1
* Follow the Rules
*Bungie Webcams

Halo 2 Account-Dealinggecko

Wow I'm gone for a few days and yet another new update has been added, looks really neat.

  • 11.13.2008 7:15 PM PDT

Average Joe l Youtube Channel l Twitter
Fools react, masters respond

~B.B.

That definitely would make sense. I'm guessing that it's a really rare title that the grizzled ancients get.

~Hawk
Posted By: A Deaf Boy
Whatever the missing rank, it's gotta be the highest =/



[Edited on 11.13.2008 7:16 PM PST]

  • 11.13.2008 7:15 PM PDT
  • gamertag: [none]
  • user homepage:

“To say more would spoil be it’s overall its a game that needs to be played.” - Aristotle

Posted by: hawkeye543
That definitely would make sense. I'm guessing that it's a really rare title that the grizzled ancients get.

~Hawk
Well, CAVX did find this. I'm pretty sure this qualifies as the "Grizzled Ancient" rank. So the final ones can't be something like this, we already found it....

  • 11.13.2008 7:17 PM PDT

No signature found. Click here to change this.

Posted by: Lord Snakie
Posted by: hawkeye543
That definitely would make sense. I'm guessing that it's a really rare title that the grizzled ancients get.

~Hawk
Well, CAVX did find this. I'm pretty sure this qualifies as the "Grizzled Ancient" rank. So the final ones can't be something like this, we already found it....
The last rank is related to account age, which makes me think it has to be before even the first hawtness was introduced. (2001 maybe)? The only senior members I've seen have accounts from 2003, which was before the latest hawtness. I cant say for sure (as can anyone but Achronos), but I would put my money there.

  • 11.13.2008 7:19 PM PDT

My Best Bungie moment: finally beating all the Halo games on solo legendary.
My Worst Bungie moment: not seeing giant stuffie grunts in the Bungie store.

This is so AWESOME.
Even though I don't post enough to be heroic I at least get some recognition for having a clean history and being a long time member.
Great work Bungie on this idea.

  • 11.13.2008 7:19 PM PDT

I lost the game.
And so did you!

Posted by: Lord Snakie
Posted by: hawkeye543
That definitely would make sense. I'm guessing that it's a really rare title that the grizzled ancients get.

~Hawk
Well, CAVX did find this. I'm pretty sure this qualifies as the "Grizzled Ancient" rank. So the final ones can't be something like this, we already found it....


Maybe it's the lowest? I'm sure it would have been seen by now, but you never know. Something below a member and absent member or something.

  • 11.13.2008 7:20 PM PDT

c|_|Care mug begs to differ.

therewillbecake@aperturescience.com

It's still confusing. It should get easier over time, though.

  • 11.13.2008 7:22 PM PDT
  • gamertag: [none]
  • user homepage:

Well I looked up two if this site's oldest active members in the search of this missing prefix.
My search was in vain for one of them was an exalted mythic and the other had no prefix at all.

  • 11.13.2008 7:23 PM PDT
  • gamertag: [none]
  • user homepage:

***Aberrant Designs***

Finished the fight on September 26,2007, 10:49pm EST
Remembered Reach on September 15th, 2010 9:30pm EST

What about "Sacred" member? That seems to fit the bill a little...

  • 11.13.2008 7:23 PM PDT
Subject: Forum update: 11.13.2008 (The addition of title prefixes))

"If you fight it, you become it."

I've been gone for a while, but to see this is really cool. Keep it up guys. -CB

  • 11.13.2008 7:24 PM PDT
Subject: Forum update?

Now that I've read up on this some more, I am liking it even more. I wonder what the last prefix is that hasn't been found yet.

  • 11.13.2008 7:25 PM PDT

Average Joe l Youtube Channel l Twitter
Fools react, masters respond

~B.B.

I doubt it. I don't think Achronos would add something that is lower then member, there is a possibility though.

~Hawk
Posted by: injurred potato
Maybe it's the lowest? I'm sure it would have been seen by now, but you never know. Something below a member and absent member or something.

  • 11.13.2008 7:25 PM PDT

One nation, under God I 2012 NBA Champions Miami Heat
1/20/2017 Four more years of hell
___.............._______/```````````````:::--.
|.==,-.~;. ____:._______ __’__’__’_ _ _\===
|................--:---:--:--‘---:,, ,,, ,,, ,,,:---: /=
`-.,.__._._,,...---:::"

Sacred does seem to fit a bit. No idea though, I just realized the new updates a few minutes ago.

  • 11.13.2008 7:27 PM PDT

You're either first or you're last.

You'll never amount to anything, go back under your bridge.

I fell from Heroic to normal, for the second time, and I had just been "promoted" Dang man, I've been a member for years, lol.
They're pretty cool titles, nonetheless.

[Edited on 11.13.2008 7:29 PM PST]

  • 11.13.2008 7:28 PM PDT

cool! hopefully this will boost positive forum activity...

  • 11.13.2008 7:30 PM PDT
Subject: Forum update: 11.13.2008 (The addition of title prefixes))

Gamertag - Rdog 11

Call me Rdog, not RdOG or RdOG1507. I made that username when I thought it was cool to use alternating capital and lowercase letters...

Thread saved.

  • 11.13.2008 7:30 PM PDT
Subject: Forum update?
  • gamertag: [none]
  • user homepage:

“To say more would spoil be it’s overall its a game that needs to be played.” - Aristotle

A thought just occurred to me- perhaps we're looking in the wrong places. I think Achronos may have accidentally/purposely dropped a clue to us in finding the final title.

In the post where he described what in a member's history determined the current prefixes we have, he discussed how Fabled and Intrepid member are based upon activity- both Private Group activity and Public Forum activity. Why do you think there are so few Intrepid and Fabled members roaming around- they have two different variables that affect the title name, and thus, half of them are spread out in private groups and don't oft post on the public forums.

This got me thinking... what about somebody that pretty much always posted in private groups? What about somebody who's title was affected solely by their private posts? What if the final title is something about hardly ever posting on the public forums, but posting incredibly often in private groups, or making a lot of groups and hardly ever posting on the public forums... I don't know, but it seems like just the thing that could fool us. If the last rank is hiding among private groups alone, we wouldn't find it from scouring the public forums. I think the final prefix, then, is something about private groups.

  • 11.13.2008 7:33 PM PDT

If you want to join in on the most fascinating and beneficial group on Bungie.Net, come and join Black Water Ops, Most active group on B.Net (FACT)

Posted by: Lord Snakie
A thought just occurred to me- perhaps we're looking in the wrong places. I think Achronos may have accidentally/purposely dropped a clue to us in finding the final title.

In the post where he described what in a member's history determined the current prefixes we have, he discussed how Fabled and Intrepid member are based upon activity- both Private Group activity and Public Forum activity. Why do you think there are so few Intrepid and Fabled members roaming around- they have two different variables that affect the title name, and thus, half of them are spread out in private groups and don't oft post on the public forums.

This got me thinking... what about somebody that pretty much always posted in private groups? What about somebody who's title was affected solely by their private posts? What if the final title is something about hardly ever posting on the public forums, but posting incredibly often in private groups, or making a lot of groups and hardly ever posting on the public forums... I don't know, but it seems like just the thing that could fool us. If the last rank is hiding among private groups alone, we wouldn't find it from scouring the public forums. I think the final prefix, then, is something about private groups.

True. I just realized, you are an intrepid as well. I wonder if all you said reflects on what others might mean too.

  • 11.13.2008 7:38 PM PDT

No signature found. Click here to change this.

Achronos said that the final prefix is related to account age, so private group activity shouldn't be a variable in the prefix. The clue he dropped is right in front of our noses, but those who fit its requirements may be so few and far between it is nearly impossible to find them in the terrabytes of information this site has.

You could have been on to something Snakie, but it just doesn't seem to apply here in this scenario.

  • 11.13.2008 7:38 PM PDT