Halo 2 Forum
This topic has moved here: Subject: IF YOU MADE HALO 2, WHAT WOULD YOU PUT IN IT?
  • Subject: IF YOU MADE HALO 2, WHAT WOULD YOU PUT IN IT?
  • Pages:
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • of 3
Subject: IF YOU MADE HALO 2, WHAT WOULD YOU PUT IN IT?
  • gamertag:
  • user homepage:
  • last post: 01.01.0001 12:00 AM PDT

I would add mantling. It's embarassing that anytimes you come up to an object that's six feet tall there's absolutely no way the Chief can get on top of it. I can easily jump up, catch the top of any eight foot tall fence and then use my arms to pullmyself up, why can't the chief?

  • 07.06.2004 9:01 AM PDT
  • gamertag:
  • user homepage:
  • last post: 01.01.0001 12:00 AM PDT

Use a top down view for one player on each in multiplayer. Allow them to issue commands, such as move to target, attack target, etc.

  • 07.06.2004 9:51 AM PDT
  • gamertag:
  • user homepage:
  • last post: 01.01.0001 12:00 AM PDT

I would put Jenni in it, she would be a nasty whore with lots of STDs.

  • 07.06.2004 10:28 AM PDT
  • gamertag:
  • user homepage:
  • last post: 01.01.0001 12:00 AM PDT

i've had this idea for a vehicle that i call the porcupine. it's a human vehicle (but you would already know this because you know that all human vehicles are named after animals (pelican, worthog, scorpion,etc...)) but it would have either machine guns or rocket launchers (or lazers if bungie decides to make that a human weapon and not strictly a sentinal weapon) and all these weapons would be mounted all around the driver who sits in the middle. it would be slow moving and would be about 15 feet in diameter. it would be mostly an offensive/defensive weapon that would either be placed in the middle of a convoy or used to assist infintry in clearing an urban area where attackers have a place to flank. it would sit between 5 to 9 people (including pilot in the center) and would be heavily armored but still defeatable by simply hurling a grenade in the middle of the thing where it would funnel down into the pilots seat and blowing the engine taking the entire vehicle with it or just by keep shooting the damn thing till there's nothing left. so what do you think?

  • 07.06.2004 10:53 AM PDT
  • gamertag:
  • user homepage:
  • last post: 01.01.0001 12:00 AM PDT

i think it sounds like a garbage vehicle much like the tank was in multiplayer of halo1. All you need to do to beat it, is sit at the other side of the map and fire your ranged weapons at it. It's too slow to really dodge any projectile weapon and snipers have an incredibley easy time picking passengers or the drivers off.

It's the main reason why people don't play the "all" vehicle setting in any serious tournament match. Tanks are worthless piles in the long run, and it's basically because you can't miss them with any long range weapon, and if you get a rocket launcher close enough they can't move fast enough to dodge it. With target tracking on RL's in halo2 i don't think it's going to be worth even attempting to get into any real heavy artilery vehicles.

Better off with a high powered stationary turrent.

  • 07.06.2004 11:31 AM PDT
  • gamertag:
  • user homepage:
  • last post: 01.01.0001 12:00 AM PDT

the new enemies would be marine chicks and female gunts elites brutes jackals all naked :Pmmmmmmmmmmmmmmm

  • 07.06.2004 11:32 AM PDT
  • gamertag:
  • user homepage:
  • last post: 01.01.0001 12:00 AM PDT

I appreciate your thoughts creep so now that i know this information maybe i can modify the vehicle accordingly. perhaps a roof over the vehicle. maybe better protection for the passengers and either anti-rocket armor where you need like 5 rockets to destroy the vehicle and it's compleatly bullet proof but it still moves slowly. think of this version like a mobile fortress or it could go very fast and spin the entier unit while it moves making it harder for sniper to shoot in and hader for rockets to get a lock on it. and just to put this in the barrel. i never really intended for this vehicle to be used in multiplayer mode just in single player mode. but maybe with these revisions it will work better. remember this vehicle isn't suppose to be invincible. it's suppose to have weak points to make some ballance in the game. thanks for your thoughts and let me know if maybe these revisions make the vehicle more desirible to me.

  • 07.06.2004 11:50 AM PDT
  • gamertag:
  • user homepage:
  • last post: 01.01.0001 12:00 AM PDT

Posted by: pooperscooper69
the new enemies would be marine chicks and female gunts elites brutes jackals all naked :Pmmmmmmmmmmmmmmm

Girl: "Excuse me while I go wash off these covenant guts"
Guy: "No baby, LEAVE THEM ON!"

  • 07.06.2004 12:02 PM PDT
  • gamertag:
  • user homepage:
  • last post: 01.01.0001 12:00 AM PDT

i would make it so if u were holding a weapon that is dualwieldable u coan pick up a corpse of a grunt or jaackal and use it as a shield

  • 07.06.2004 12:03 PM PDT
  • gamertag:
  • user homepage:
  • last post: 01.01.0001 12:00 AM PDT

Well Ace star to tell you the truth, even in single player barring the first few times i played thru assault on the control room, i never got into the tank. Against multiple covenant vehicles it's just too slow and too big to bother with. Wraiths own it for free, banshee's own it for free, hunters own it for free. As far as my preference for vehicles went it was

1.Banshee Good firepower and good maneuverability.
2a. Warthog is a great vehicle if you have a marine with a sniper rifle riding shotgun, and another marine manning the turrent. But with basic standard marines in only one or both non-driving positions the warthog falls below the ghost.
2b. Ghost Fast enough and maneuverable enough to take on other ghosts with ease, and take out a few smaller squads of covenant if things got too close, you just turn tail and run away or ditch the vehicle and fight on foot.
3.My feet
4. Scorpion

So unless your vehicle is much smaller and faster OR can withstand 3-4 wraith shots and have surving passengers then i dont see myself ever feeling the need to jump in it unless i just felt like trying it out.

  • 07.06.2004 12:17 PM PDT
  • gamertag:
  • user homepage:
  • last post: 01.01.0001 12:00 AM PDT

i woud put the forerunners relly cool wepons you can't have til ya at least beat on easey[ i oneasey 4 on normal 7 on hard and 9 on 10 a a bounous one] i would put the hunter foul rod gun a neddlersniper and a plasmagrnadlaucher stuff like that

  • 07.06.2004 2:46 PM PDT
  • gamertag:
  • user homepage:
  • last post: 01.01.0001 12:00 AM PDT

i woud makr forerunner veichals you unlock for singal but are in mutiplayer

  • 07.06.2004 2:48 PM PDT
  • gamertag:
  • user homepage:
  • last post: 01.01.0001 12:00 AM PDT

sleeping is good. but if i didn't sleep posting in these forums would be my pastime...so many people who love halo

  • 07.06.2004 6:41 PM PDT
  • gamertag:
  • user homepage:
  • last post: 01.01.0001 12:00 AM PDT

I would put new vehicles, covenant and lots of new weapons

  • 07.06.2004 8:27 PM PDT

I'll be on my own side.

i'd put Xeroh in it in the form of a super strong Covie species so i could see if all her death threats had meaning or if she was bluffing.

  • 07.06.2004 8:30 PM PDT
  • gamertag:
  • user homepage:
  • last post: 01.01.0001 12:00 AM PDT

I would have a bonus level with thousands of grunts that try (lol) and destroy you. yeah!

  • 07.06.2004 8:51 PM PDT
  • gamertag:
  • user homepage:
  • last post: 01.01.0001 12:00 AM PDT

Personlly, I would would have naked Elites and Grunts. That would be cool Rarrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrr!

  • 07.06.2004 9:31 PM PDT
  • gamertag:
  • user homepage:
  • last post: 01.01.0001 12:00 AM PDT

dude ur weird


ok back to the topic...hmmm... i would make WAY!!! more lvl's andlots of weaponds and evrything sooo reallistic.

  • 07.06.2004 10:26 PM PDT
  • gamertag:
  • user homepage:
  • last post: 01.01.0001 12:00 AM PDT

Smoke grenades if done right and looked good graphics and animations with wind and stuff going through it and smoke would react like a wharthog driving thought it the smoke would part around the hog. Also I would the option of first person perspective in vehicles in first person because being in the side seat looks so cool and just imagine gunner or driver.

  • 07.06.2004 10:30 PM PDT
  • gamertag:
  • user homepage:
  • last post: 01.01.0001 12:00 AM PDT

Nice!!! Ross.

  • 07.06.2004 10:54 PM PDT
  • gamertag:
  • user homepage:
  • last post: 01.01.0001 12:00 AM PDT

i would have a tank with a MAC cannon on it. it would be really slow and take a while to reload, but would blow up half the map

  • 07.06.2004 10:57 PM PDT
  • gamertag:
  • user homepage:
  • last post: 01.01.0001 12:00 AM PDT

Stop - Maka

[Edited on 7/7/2004 12:12:26 AM by MakaVeli4LIfe1]

  • 07.07.2004 12:09 AM PDT
  • gamertag:
  • user homepage:
  • last post: 01.01.0001 12:00 AM PDT

Go to sleep if you're in a bad mood, damn - Maka

[Edited on 7/7/2004 12:12:46 AM by MakaVeli4LIfe1]

  • 07.07.2004 12:10 AM PDT
  • gamertag:
  • user homepage:
  • last post: 01.01.0001 12:00 AM PDT

Posted by: EliteX72
Personlly, I would would have naked Elites and Grunts. That would be cool Rarrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrr!


Can you spell "Disturbing Fetish"? No? Well I guess you're just another idiot.

  • 07.07.2004 12:13 AM PDT

  • Pages:
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • of 3