- KSI cojack
- |
- Exalted Member
I believe that Halo 2 is better. JUST IN MY OPINION, DONT FLAME.
In Halo 2, everything seemed faster-paced and you seemed to be doing more at once than in Halo 3. The weapons just felt better and the overall play just felt natural and better than the clunky feeling of Halo 3.
Don't even get me started on the maps. Pretty much every Halo 2 map was amazing and had amazing design to it and they really stood out in art and game design. The settings were believable, and most importantly fun to play on.
The community is now better than Halo 2 than Halo 3 now, because everyone saw a new game with shinier graphics and they went on to it. The people that either don't own a 360 or enjoy Halo 2 are playing it now, and the majority dont even have mics, which in my opinion is nice.
The campaign also in my opinion is better than Halo 3. In Halo 2, you were moved around to different environments and you got to experience the dilemnas of both sides of the conflict, not just the narrow-minded view of the humans. You got a deeper look into Covenant politics and the civil war that split the Elites and Brutes. The worlds contrasted each other drastically, and the art was yet again spectacular. As far as a cliffhanger ending goes, WHY WOULDNT THERE BE ONE IN THE MIDDLE OF A SERIES? I dont get why people complain about this. If a game is in the middle of its trilogy, why end it at the second game. Your SUPPOSED to leave suspense for the next game, not finish the storyline.
So overall, Halo 2 was, JUST IN MY OPINION, a better game. Better campaign and multiplayer gameplay and story just led to superior gameplay and therefore a better game.
-Thorium