Off Topic: The Flood
This topic has moved here: Subject: What is a good movie?
  • Subject: What is a good movie?
Subject: What is a good movie?
  • gamertag:
  • user homepage:
  • last post: 01.01.0001 12:00 AM PDT

I am going to a movie today and I do n't know which movie to see. Any ideas?

  • 07.10.2004 9:28 AM PDT
  • gamertag:
  • user homepage:
  • last post: 01.01.0001 12:00 AM PDT

Spiderman 2 was pretty cool
Dodgeball was freaking hilarous
I'm gonna go and see Anchorman today, go to that.
I don't know, there's some ideas for ya.

WHATEVER YOU DO, DON'T SEE FAHRENHEIT 9/11 -- MICHEAL MOORE IS A DOUCHE!!

  • 07.10.2004 9:32 AM PDT
  • gamertag:
  • user homepage:
  • last post: 01.01.0001 12:00 AM PDT

Micheal Moore is awesome, why do you not like him?

  • 07.10.2004 9:35 AM PDT
  • gamertag:
  • user homepage:
  • last post: 01.01.0001 12:00 AM PDT

Go see Farenheit 9/11. It's amazing.

  • 07.10.2004 9:43 AM PDT
  • gamertag:
  • user homepage:
  • last post: 01.01.0001 12:00 AM PDT

I like him too, I am going to see it as soon as it comes out to rent.

  • 07.10.2004 9:44 AM PDT
  • gamertag:
  • user homepage:
  • last post: 01.01.0001 12:00 AM PDT

I really hope you're kidding.

Seriously, man, do you have any ideas of how much he lies and manipulates his data? How much of a pompous ass he is? The fact that he says "there is no terrorist threat" and thinks that Osama bin Laden would never want to hurt a fly and that Saddam was a great leader and should be put back to power. He thinks that Kim Jong Il, the president of North Korea who is a psycho and is refining plutonium as we speak to make nuclear missiles to use against the United States is a good guy who's got a great sense of humor and loves movies. Micheal Moore is brilliant in the sense of how he manipulates things in his documentaries to get his audience to infer entirely wrong ideas about what's going on. He's also an idiot in that same sense: he can't think of any other way to get his ideas across than to totally screw up the truth because otherwise everyone knows what he thinks is bull-blam!-. If you did some research and looked into his stuff for real facts, you'll find that it's all fiction and has been manipulated.

  • 07.10.2004 9:51 AM PDT
  • gamertag:
  • user homepage:
  • last post: 01.01.0001 12:00 AM PDT

for all you poor saps who think Fahrenheit 9/11 is such a brilliant movie...here's a little tidbit of some of the lies contained in it.

http://www.moorelies.com/news/archives/display.cfm?newsID=164




http://www.roadofanation.com/blog/archive/2004_07_01_roadofan ation _archive.html#108918450965633448

[Edited on 7/10/2004 10:11:07 AM]

  • 07.10.2004 10:08 AM PDT
  • gamertag:
  • user homepage:
  • last post: 01.01.0001 12:00 AM PDT

Posted by: Casey
I really hope you're kidding.

Seriously, man, do you have any ideas of how much he lies and manipulates his data? How much of a pompous ass he is? The fact that he says "there is no terrorist threat" and thinks that Osama bin Laden would never want to hurt a fly and that Saddam was a great leader and should be put back to power. He thinks that Kim Jong Il, the president of North Korea who is a psycho and is refining plutonium as we speak to make nuclear missiles to use against the United States is a good guy who's got a great sense of humor and loves movies. Micheal Moore is brilliant in the sense of how he manipulates things in his documentaries to get his audience to infer entirely wrong ideas about what's going on. He's also an idiot in that same sense: he can't think of any other way to get his ideas across than to totally screw up the truth because otherwise everyone knows what he thinks is bull-blam!-. If you did some research and looked into his stuff for real facts, you'll find that it's all fiction and has been manipulated.

You are f u c k i n g retarded he never said that Bin Laden couldnt hurt a fly he said he attacked on 9/11 and wont attack for a while! Your a f u c k i n g idiot! I wish I could stomp your stupid f u c k i n g face in you peice of iggnorant s h i t!

  • 07.10.2004 10:11 AM PDT
  • gamertag:
  • user homepage:
  • last post: 01.01.0001 12:00 AM PDT

Shut your f u c k i n g face you lying peice of s h i t n00b go suck your mom's dick!Or rub Bush's nipples! Come out of that cave you live in and except the fact that good ol' G. Dubya is a dumb worthless peice of s h i t excuse for a president!

  • 07.10.2004 10:14 AM PDT
  • gamertag:
  • user homepage:
  • last post: 01.01.0001 12:00 AM PDT

y'know, by saying this all you're doing is proving your ignorance to me. c'mon, read those articles in those links. They're about an Iraqi who saw Fahrenheit 9/11...and lived under Saddam for 20 years.

maybe you should come out of THAT cave that you live in and accept the fact that Micheal Moore is an idiot who manipulates his information to sway people like you to believe in his crooked ways. You really don't know what he leaves out, rearranges, changes, implies, and just plain COMPLETELY CHANGES in his so-called "documentaries," do you? Y'know, it's people like you who bring shame to America.
you say that Good ol' G. Dubya is a dumb worthless p.o.s. -- and Clinton wasn't?! Clinton was the guy downsized our military and intelligence forces, thought solving a terrorist problem meant shooting a cruise missile at a house, and took a BJ from Monica and then lied about it, UNDER OATH, in front of a jury but later admitted it on Larry King Live a few weeks ago. On 9/11, even the Liberals who hated Bush with a passion thought it was good that he was our president and not Al Gore, because Gore wouldn't have done anything about terrorism. Bush's idea of responding to a terrorist attack on our sovriegnity is actually RESPONDING. Rooting out the terrorsts, trying to establish a government, taking out their leaders...y'know, stuff that ACTUALLY works.

  • 07.10.2004 10:28 AM PDT
  • gamertag:
  • user homepage:
  • last post: 01.01.0001 12:00 AM PDT

Did you even see F 9/11?

  • 07.10.2004 10:30 AM PDT
  • gamertag:
  • user homepage:
  • last post: 01.01.0001 12:00 AM PDT

Posted by: Jnice
Posted by: Casey
I really hope you're kidding.

Seriously, man, do you have any ideas of how much he lies and manipulates his data? How much of a pompous ass he is? The fact that he says "there is no terrorist threat" and thinks that Osama bin Laden would never want to hurt a fly and that Saddam was a great leader and should be put back to power. He thinks that Kim Jong Il, the president of North Korea who is a psycho and is refining plutonium as we speak to make nuclear missiles to use against the United States is a good guy who's got a great sense of humor and loves movies. Micheal Moore is brilliant in the sense of how he manipulates things in his documentaries to get his audience to infer entirely wrong ideas about what's going on. He's also an idiot in that same sense: he can't think of any other way to get his ideas across than to totally screw up the truth because otherwise everyone knows what he thinks is bull-blam!-. If you did some research and looked into his stuff for real facts, you'll find that it's all fiction and has been manipulated.

You are f u c k i n g retarded he never said that Bin Laden couldnt hurt a fly he said he attacked on 9/11 and wont attack for a while! Your a f u c k i n g idiot! I wish I could stomp your stupid f u c k i n g face in you peice of iggnorant s h i t!


if I may quote Micheal Moore from his book, Dude, Where's My Country?:

in this book, he asks several questions to the president.

Question 3: Who Attacked the United States on September 11--a guy on dialysis in a cave in Afghanistan, or your friends, Saudi Arabia?

So, what you're saying, is that Micheal Moore is making a big ol' fuss about how Bin Laden planned everything out the 9/11 attacks, and then later on he says that Bin Laden didn't do it, but it was all the fault of SAUDI ARABIA (who happens to be our allies, in case you didn't know that)!

umm...I don't know what's running through your mind, but Mr. Moore just contradicted himself, buddy. I wonder who's the idiot now?

Oh, did you know that Micheal Moore also said that we'd never catch Saddam, too?

  • 07.10.2004 10:35 AM PDT
  • gamertag:
  • user homepage:
  • last post: 01.01.0001 12:00 AM PDT

Casey, I respect you point of view but I do believe that it has been perverted by right propoganda. How did George Bush respond to terrorism? By invading a country that had nothing to do with it, had no WMDs, and by definition was opposed to the ideals of Islamic extremists. Saddam had a secular government that was actually suppressing the extremists and terrorists in Iraq, unfortunately right along with the regular people there. Still, Saddam went after enemies of his regime, the average civilians went on living their lives. Now the country is in anarchy. Anyways, that irresponsible drunk who stole the election last time is doing nothing about terrorism, but he is using it as a tool to scare the masses. Honestly, he cannot stop terrorism. No one can. They can strike at will using any weapon conceivable through our seaports. I'm sure there are already hundreds of dormant cells waiting for a signal from Al Quaeda (probably sent out on Al Jazeera). One of the 9/11 hijackers had lived only four blocks from me. You seriously can't stop these people by invading random Middle Eastern countries. In fact, I wouldn't be surprised if Bin Laden staged an attack and purposely failed to help Bush win - after all, if the Armed Forces keep knocking off governments over there the extremists will be free to take over. Oh yea, did I mention that there are a hell of a lot more potential terrorists now? Thanks for pissing Islam off, you motherf***ing Texan excuse for a human being. Thanks for f***ing up America's budget and reputation. It's all on my generation now.

  • 07.10.2004 10:42 AM PDT
  • gamertag:
  • user homepage:
  • last post: 01.01.0001 12:00 AM PDT

y'know, I haven't seen F 9/11 yet. I've heard good things and I've heard a lot more bad things. I've read a few of Fat Mikey's books and have seen Bowling for Columbine, and am reading the book Micheal Moore is a Big Fat Stupid White Man right now...it's showing me about how much this guy lies and manipulates things. It cites all these specific examples of him changing all these facts and stuff...all I can say is that I can now definitely tell that Fahrenheit 9/11 hardly has a shred of credibility in it, just like all his other stuff that I've now seen all the false "truths" in.

  • 07.10.2004 10:44 AM PDT
  • gamertag:
  • user homepage:
  • last post: 01.01.0001 12:00 AM PDT

Posted by: Terran Grunt
Casey, I respect you point of view but I do believe that it has been perverted by right propoganda. How did George Bush respond to terrorism? By invading a country that had nothing to do with it, had no WMDs, and by definition was opposed to the ideals of Islamic extremists. Saddam had a secular government that was actually suppressing the extremists and terrorists in Iraq, unfortunately right along with the regular people there. Still, Saddam went after enemies of his regime, the average civilians went on living their lives. Now the country is in anarchy. Anyways, that irresponsible drunk who stole the election last time is doing nothing about terrorism, but he is using it as a tool to scare the masses. Honestly, he cannot stop terrorism. No one can. They can strike at will using any weapon conceivable through our seaports. I'm sure there are already hundreds of dormant cells waiting for a signal from Al Quaeda (probably sent out on Al Jazeera). One of the 9/11 hijackers had lived only four blocks from me. You seriously can't stop these people by invading random Middle Eastern countries. In fact, I wouldn't be surprised if Bin Laden staged an attack and purposely failed to help Bush win - after all, if the Armed Forces keep knocking off governments over there the extremists will be free to take over. Oh yea, did I mention that there are a hell of a lot more potential terrorists now? Thanks for pissing Islam off, you motherf***ing Texan excuse for a human being. Thanks for f***ing up America's budget and reputation. It's all on my generation now.

Thank you.

  • 07.10.2004 10:45 AM PDT
  • gamertag:
  • user homepage:
  • last post: 01.01.0001 12:00 AM PDT

Posted by: Casey
y'know, I haven't seen F 9/11 yet. I've heard good things and I've heard a lot more bad things. I've read a few of Fat Mikey's books and have seen Bowling for Columbine, and am reading the book Micheal Moore is a Big Fat Stupid White Man right now...it's showing me about how much this guy lies and manipulates things. It cites all these specific examples of him changing all these facts and stuff...all I can say is that I can now definitely tell that Fahrenheit 9/11 hardly has a shred of credibility in it, just like all his other stuff that I've now seen all the false "truths" in.

You gave money to someone you hate! Your a f u c k i n g idiot!

  • 07.10.2004 10:46 AM PDT
  • gamertag:
  • user homepage:
  • last post: 01.01.0001 12:00 AM PDT

It is true that Saudia Arabia has connections with the Bush family, and although Michael Moore does overexaggerate these connections, I wouldn't call Saudi Arabia an ally. No... they're a country that harbors and supports terrorists, but like Pakistan, Syria, and Yemen they're exempt from the Bush doctrine. Meanwhile, we invade Iraq which has no connections to terrorism, killing 1,000+ members of the U.S. Armed Forces in the process.

And don't think I'm a liberal; I'm a libertarian with some common sense.

  • 07.10.2004 11:03 AM PDT
  • gamertag:
  • user homepage:
  • last post: 01.01.0001 12:00 AM PDT

Good movie? Boondock Saints. 'Nuff said.

  • 07.10.2004 11:06 AM PDT
  • gamertag:
  • user homepage:
  • last post: 01.01.0001 12:00 AM PDT

Posted by: Terran Grunt
Casey, I respect you point of view but I do believe that it has been perverted by right propoganda. How did George Bush respond to terrorism? By invading a country that had nothing to do with it, had no WMDs, and by definition was opposed to the ideals of Islamic extremists. Saddam had a secular government that was actually suppressing the extremists and terrorists in Iraq, unfortunately right along with the regular people there. Still, Saddam went after enemies of his regime, the average civilians went on living their lives. Now the country is in anarchy. Anyways, that irresponsible drunk who stole the election last time is doing nothing about terrorism, but he is using it as a tool to scare the masses. Honestly, he cannot stop terrorism. No one can. They can strike at will using any weapon conceivable through our seaports. I'm sure there are already hundreds of dormant cells waiting for a signal from Al Quaeda (probably sent out on Al Jazeera). One of the 9/11 hijackers had lived only four blocks from me. You seriously can't stop these people by invading random Middle Eastern countries. In fact, I wouldn't be surprised if Bin Laden staged an attack and purposely failed to help Bush win - after all, if the Armed Forces keep knocking off governments over there the extremists will be free to take over. Oh yea, did I mention that there are a hell of a lot more potential terrorists now? Thanks for pissing Islam off, you motherf***ing Texan excuse for a human being. Thanks for f***ing up America's budget and reputation. It's all on my generation now.


And while I respect your viewpoints as well, I might have to add that I think your thinking has been not distorted by the leftist control on our media today, but that you haven't seen the whole side of the story because the Media today is so obsessed with making Bush look bad that they censor the good things that go on in Iraq. They'll talk about how a building gets blown up or how a soldier gets killed, but when a building gets rebuilt or a soldier gives a kid a candy bar it's terrible news and shoudln't be let out of Iraq. Geraldo Rivera went to Iraq earlier this year (I think) and when he came back he said that it wasn't that bad over there. He said the media was making it look much worse than it really was.

Hey buddy, there's been tons of Islamic terrorists out for us way before Bush was in power, I hate to break it to ya. Islamic militants have been attacking American people and interests since 1970. Did you know that's why the Delta Force branch of Special Forces was created? It was to combat--you guessed it--terrorism! There have been a hell of a lot of potential terrorists ready to destroy American people and American interests for nearly thirty years.

I also hate to break it to ya, but WMDs aren't just nukes. Sure, we didn't find any nukes in Iraq, but you know what we did find? Sarin gas, Anthrax...those are Chemical and Biological Weapons of Mass Destruction. How else do you think Saddam killed nearly 100,000 Kurds when he bombed them with Chemical weapons?

I find it funny that you pin the blame of "pissing Islam off" on Bush. Like I said before, Islamic radicals were pissed at us far back as the 70's. Hmm...lemme think of who was President during the 70's...Nixon, Ford, and Carter! Not Bush.

Okay, Bush first responded to Terrorism by invading Afghanistan, not Iraq. Afghanistan has plenty to do with terrorism! Honestly, so does Iraq. Maybe it wasn't so much actively carried out terrorist bombings against U.S. interests from Iraq (although, Saddam did launch SCUD missiles at Iraq), he was raising all of his people to hate the U.S. And there was plenty of terrorism going on inside of Iraq, too. How else do you think Saddam kept such control over his people?

  • 07.10.2004 11:08 AM PDT
  • gamertag:
  • user homepage:
  • last post: 01.01.0001 12:00 AM PDT

What makes you think I paid for his books and to see his movie? I read through his books at Barnes and Noble, and watched Bowling for Columbine downloaded off the internet at a friend's house.

But anyhow, wasn't this thread supposed to be about good movies to go and see?

Another great movie right now is Hellboy. It was pretty cool.

  • 07.10.2004 11:11 AM PDT
  • gamertag:
  • user homepage:
  • last post: 01.01.0001 12:00 AM PDT

They had very small quantities of those biological and chemical agents. It's not like they're hard to get - I could grow Sarin in my backyard if I felt like it. What I meant when I said that he pissed of Islam was that he angered those who before had simply been devout Muslims by invading another of their countries. Yes, it is true that they have been angry for a while (mainly because of Israel, and I don't blame them for that). Oh, and it is quite possible for a dirty nuke to be brought into the United States without being detected. They don't even need a place like Indian Point to cause a meltdown... Also, don't think I underestimate the good work that is happening in Iraq. It's true that the Armed Forces are trying to rebuild the country, but without a domestic police agency the U.S. troops are going to be there for quite a while losing lives. This is of particular importance to me because my cousin, a Marine 1st Lieutenant, has just returned and I would hate to see her have to go back. Also, my friend is planning on joining the Army because it's just about his only option if he wants to attend college. Anyways, since Saddam was not sponsoring terrorism against the U.S. I guess the best reason they can come up with for invading is becase the people were supressed. Since when is the U.S. responsible for preventing this? Seriously, we need to relinquish the position of world policeman and hand it over to China - they're the only ones that really want it. If there had been another country with policy similar to what the U.S. has now back when slavery was still prominent in the U.S., wouldn't they have invaded?

  • 07.10.2004 11:20 AM PDT