Halo: Reach Forum
This topic has moved here: Subject: But...I thought "no more Halo games after ODST"
  • Subject: But...I thought "no more Halo games after ODST"
Subject: But...I thought "no more Halo games after ODST"

What spectagon are you in?

maybe they meant no games after odst in the halo timeline lol

  • 06.01.2009 1:15 PM PDT
  • gamertag: [none]
  • user homepage:

Veto for ARs!!!!

I believe the statement was (roughly) that there would be no more games in the original trilogy, from that story arc. Halo CE, 2, 3. Those three would be it.

Making a prequel doesn't exactly violate that. Just don't pull a Star Wars and get all mediocre after the first 3 games were so good! ;)

  • 06.01.2009 1:15 PM PDT
  • gamertag:
  • user homepage:
  • last post: 01.01.0001 12:00 AM PDT

Posted by: AGDTinMan
Team Xbox has it wrong. Bungie is definitely making Reach.


Bungie found a loophole. They said their would be no more sequels to Halo 3, so they made a Prequel.
Go Bungie!
You guys know your stuff.

  • 06.01.2009 1:16 PM PDT

What spectagon are you in?

Posted by: AGDTinMan
Team Xbox has it wrong. Bungie is definitely making Reach.


why don't you have yellow text anymore?

  • 06.01.2009 1:17 PM PDT

You don't kick a man when they're down, so don't teabag me when I'm dead!

Bungie kept this good and quiet.

And this thread may be the fist hot topic in this foum. So congratz!

  • 06.01.2009 1:18 PM PDT

I made countless posts on here telling you all that Halo 4 WOULD be made! Who was right!!! oh yeh thats me!

I also bought halo4reach.com so will make a good few $$$ from that, Love you BUNGIE!!!! <3

  • 06.01.2009 1:20 PM PDT

Master Chief: "I was gonna shoot my way out. Mix things up a little."

BWO

I can't say I know for sure, this is interesting

  • 06.01.2009 1:22 PM PDT
  • gamertag:
  • user homepage:
  • last post: 01.01.0001 12:00 AM PDT

whats it matter as long as they make games we will play them if you have a problem with them making the game then just don't play it comrade

  • 06.01.2009 1:24 PM PDT
  • gamertag:
  • user homepage:
  • last post: 01.01.0001 12:00 AM PDT

Posted by: SiLvErBaCkEd
I made countless posts on here telling you all that Halo 4 WOULD be made! Who was right!!! oh yeh thats me!

I also bought halo4reach.com so will make a good few $$$ from that, Love you BUNGIE!!!! <3
but this aint halo 4 its just a prequel so im pretty sure your not going to make a whole lot of money off the page

  • 06.01.2009 1:26 PM PDT

Bungie has lied in the past.
It is a Bungie game, and MS is publishing like always.


Whoever posted that on Team Xbox is STUPID. If it was a Bungie game, they wouldn't have Bungie out they're saying people in Bungie have been working on it.

Idiots.



@SiLvErBaCkEd

Its not Halo 4. /facepalm


[Edited on 06.01.2009 1:27 PM PDT]

  • 06.01.2009 1:27 PM PDT

Actually, they didn't really lie. The press really blew it out of context though. They said Halo was the original game in the original trilogy story arc. ODST was the "bonus game" to cap it off---> notice how it takes place as part of the original trilogy.

That being said, Reach is a prequel, before the trilogy started.

  • 06.01.2009 1:27 PM PDT

Bacon

MASTER CHIEF!

  • 06.01.2009 1:27 PM PDT
  • gamertag: [none]
  • user homepage:

And the Shadow fell upon the Land, and the World was riven stone from stone. The oceans fled, and the mountains were swallowed up, and the nations were scattered to the eight corners of the World. The moon was blood, and the sun was as ashes. The seas boiled, and the living envied the dead. All was shattered, and all but memory lost, and one memory above all others, of him who brought the Shadow and the Breaking of the World. And him they named Dragon.

The game is being developed by Bungie.

  • 06.01.2009 1:28 PM PDT

Dedicated driver.

That site needs to get it's facts straight. Why would Bungie.net have a page on Reach if they weren't developing it? Geez... They didn't have a page on Halo Wars for example...

  • 06.01.2009 1:28 PM PDT

Your life is yours alone. Rise up and live it.

"Technically" its not after ODST... Its before it. (Loopholes FTW)

EDIT: I just realized I'm an Honorable Member now... Thats sexy :D

[Edited on 06.01.2009 1:31 PM PDT]

  • 06.01.2009 1:28 PM PDT
  • gamertag:
  • user homepage:
  • last post: 01.01.0001 12:00 AM PDT

Posted by: SuperAce 5
its called reverse psychology!!!!


That's not what reverse psychology is.

  • 06.01.2009 1:29 PM PDT

OMG a girl!

Well Halo:Reach is a prequel. So if they said no more Halo after 3, that could just mean the story after 3 won't be continued, prequels are still allowed :P

  • 06.01.2009 1:30 PM PDT

Well if it doesn't sell then I loose $6 ;) doubt the media will refer to the fourth halo game as halo 0.5.

It is technically halo 4 so halo4reach is good!

All my money comes from the internet and im self employed so pretty sure i know it better than you ;)

*faceplam fail (when people use language like that there obviously 14 years old from america)

  • 06.01.2009 1:47 PM PDT

I was pretty sure that they said no "Halo 4" but nothing mentioned about continuing making new halo games, and btw bungie, great decision to stick with your bread and butter

  • 06.01.2009 1:48 PM PDT

MATT

you do have a point

this is HALO:REACH

not HALO 4

lol

  • 06.01.2009 1:49 PM PDT

they said no more AFTER halo 3, but this is going to the events prior

  • 06.01.2009 1:50 PM PDT

.
The surest way to corrupt a youth is to instruct him to hold in higher regard those who think alike than those who think differently.

كل نفس ذائقة الموت

Aaaaaand.....of course Bungie didn't lie. But they did pull a little slight of hand.

Bungie Weekly Update: 10/10/08 Posted by lukems at 10/10/2008 5:43 PM PDT

I read somewhere that this is the last Halo game Bungie is making. Say it isn't so!

We're not ready to discuss the other projects underway within the studio right now but Halo 3 : Recon does represent the final basket of goodness that we will be delivering for the Halo trilogy. There are no more offshoots or side stories in the works.


So, Halo: Reach is NOT part of the Halo trilogy but it IS a Bungie project in the Halo universe. Fooled again.


[Edited on 06.01.2009 2:08 PM PDT]

  • 06.01.2009 1:51 PM PDT

The Halo game were a trilogy that had to do with DESTROYING THE HALOS. Which you did, and tragically you are floating out in outer space in a half blown up ship. So they are done with the halos. That doesn't mean master chief is gone. Now it just so happens to be, that you are floating towards a planet. SO its not a halo game. Its just title under halo because thats what everyone recognizes. You most likely wont be dealing with any more halos...

  • 06.01.2009 1:52 PM PDT

Posted by: TheCyberFreak
i]Aaaaaand.....of course Bungie didn't lie. But they did pull a little slight of hand.[/i]

Bungie Weekly Update: 10/10/08 Posted by lukems at 10/10/2008 5:43 PM PDT

I read somewhere that this is the last Halo game Bungie is making. Say it isn't so!

We're not ready to discuss the other projects underway within the studio right now but Halo 3 : Recon does represent the final basket of goodness that we will be delivering for the Halo trilogy. There are no more offshoots or side stories in the works.


So, Halo: Reach is NOT part of the Halo trilogy but it IS a Bungie project in the Halo universe. Fooled again.

Well put! Damn I wish I could state crap as good as other people.

  • 06.01.2009 1:53 PM PDT

MATT

u no it can still be the be the same thing as star wars

they made first 3

then went bac and did things before those advents
so bungie might do that

  • 06.01.2009 1:55 PM PDT