Halo: Reach Forum
This topic has moved here: Subject: But...I thought "no more Halo games after ODST"
  • Subject: But...I thought "no more Halo games after ODST"
Subject: But...I thought "no more Halo games after ODST"

I guess microsoft needed bungie back xD?

  • 06.01.2009 3:30 PM PDT

When in doubt, whip it out
-mr slave
Here is a place to customise armor to your liking
click me.
here is my choice ?

i was thinking the same thing

  • 06.01.2009 3:32 PM PDT
  • gamertag:
  • user homepage:
  • last post: 01.01.0001 12:00 AM PDT

When Bungie says "BELIEVE" they do not mean Believe everything they say!

  • 06.01.2009 3:35 PM PDT

.
The surest way to corrupt a youth is to instruct him to hold in higher regard those who think alike than those who think differently.

كل نفس ذائقة الموت

Posted by: Darklord of Sin
When Bungie says "BELIEVE" they do not mean Believe everything they say!
Yes, clearly. I just wish we didn't have to play this game. You don't HAVE to say deceptive things. You can just choose to say nothing.

I personally think it's just a silly game that Luke likes to play. Now I just have to figure out how to turn his statement that there will be no Blood Gulch remake into proof that they're remaking Blood Gulch.

  • 06.01.2009 9:18 PM PDT

The time that they said ODST was the last game actually said that it was the last Halo 3 content. Halo: Reach =/= Halo 3

  • 06.01.2009 9:22 PM PDT

Those liars!!

  • 06.01.2009 9:25 PM PDT

Semper Fidelis!

ALTOIDS RULE

the answer is simple, it is the bungie way

  • 06.01.2009 9:30 PM PDT

.
The surest way to corrupt a youth is to instruct him to hold in higher regard those who think alike than those who think differently.

كل نفس ذائقة الموت

Posted by: altoidsjedi117
the answer is simple, it is the bungie way
I don't think it's the "Bungie Way". I think it's Luke's way.

  • 06.02.2009 11:08 AM PDT

Non facete nobis calcitrare vestrum perinaeum

You have to admit, it is a very good marketing tool.

  • 06.02.2009 11:40 AM PDT

R.I.P xHenshi
R.I.P Heaven's Warrior
R.I.P Chelsey
R.I.P Jake
R.I.P Timothy Karabela
R.I.P America, the Free.
Your life can change directions at any moment. Make sure you live your life to the fullest.

I don't have a link, but I'm almost positive Bungie said that they wouldn't make a Halo 4, not other Halo games.

  • 06.02.2009 11:42 AM PDT
  • gamertag:
  • user homepage:
  • last post: 01.01.0001 12:00 AM PDT

Posted by: TheCyberFreak
Posted by: Darklord of Sin
When Bungie says "BELIEVE" they do not mean Believe everything they say!
Yes, clearly. I just wish we didn't have to play this game. You don't HAVE to say deceptive things. You can just choose to say nothing.

I personally think it's just a silly game that Luke likes to play. Now I just have to figure out how to turn his statement that there will be no Blood Gulch remake into proof that they're remaking Blood Gulch.
Speaking of the Gulch, could the beta/Reach have it? It would make the entire Halo world :)

  • 06.02.2009 11:50 AM PDT
  • gamertag: [none]
  • user homepage:

why are u reading this this is private go back to your house!!

drink beer!
drink ale
all hail to the ale

the guy said it was top secret so they wanted to suprize us but i think reach is as far as they can go unless they bring out halo the RPG then they need something new

  • 06.02.2009 11:52 AM PDT
  • gamertag:
  • user homepage:
  • last post: 01.01.0001 12:00 AM PDT

Posted by: roopz27
Posted by: GillaUnit

Posted by: roopz27

halo reach isnt made by bungie...its by a microsoft select team. bungie could be just overlooking the production


Don't make statements like that without any proof. There was a Bungie logo present on the Reach trailer.


http://news.teamxbox.com/xbox/19800/First-NonBungieDeveloped-H alo-FPS-Announced/

here is your proof
IGN says they are making it.

  • 06.02.2009 11:52 AM PDT

.
The surest way to corrupt a youth is to instruct him to hold in higher regard those who think alike than those who think differently.

كل نفس ذائقة الموت

Posted by: SnakeRunner40
Posted by: TheCyberFreak
Posted by: Darklord of Sin
When Bungie says "BELIEVE" they do not mean Believe everything they say!
Yes, clearly. I just wish we didn't have to play this game. You don't HAVE to say deceptive things. You can just choose to say nothing.

I personally think it's just a silly game that Luke likes to play. Now I just have to figure out how to turn his statement that there will be no Blood Gulch remake into proof that they're remaking Blood Gulch.
Speaking of the Gulch, could the beta/Reach have it? It would make the entire Halo world :)
I'm convinced that somewhere on Reach there's a box canyon with the precise layout of Blood Gulch. It even has a pair of military bases at either end.

I'm sure of this.

  • 06.02.2009 11:54 AM PDT
  • gamertag: [none]
  • user homepage:

Bungie is like Dattebayo, they always troll you ^^

  • 06.02.2009 12:00 PM PDT

I didn't believe them for a second.

  • 06.02.2009 12:25 PM PDT

ima BAMF

Obviously they strategically misled you, I mean come on, nobody would have got this hyped up about it if they told us they were making Halo: Reach at the same time they started making Halo 3 ODST.

  • 06.02.2009 12:33 PM PDT

ima BAMF

Posted by: SnakeRunner40
Posted by: roopz27
Posted by: GillaUnit

Posted by: roopz27

halo reach isnt made by bungie...its by a microsoft select team. bungie could be just overlooking the production


Don't make statements like that without any proof. There was a Bungie logo present on the Reach trailer.


http://news.teamxbox.com/xbox/19800/First-NonBungieDeveloped-H alo-FPS-Announced/

here is your proof
IGN says they are making it.



I have to disagree even with your proof cause im pretty sure Joe Staten said that "The guys at BUNGIE are working on a top secret project" ande then he went on to reveal Reach.

  • 06.02.2009 12:37 PM PDT
  • gamertag:
  • user homepage:
  • last post: 01.01.0001 12:00 AM PDT

Posted by: TheCyberFreak
Posted by: Darklord of Sin
When Bungie says "BELIEVE" they do not mean Believe everything they say!
Yes, clearly. I just wish we didn't have to play this game. You don't HAVE to say deceptive things. You can just choose to say nothing.

I personally think it's just a silly game that Luke likes to play. Now I just have to figure out how to turn his statement that there will be no Blood Gulch remake into proof that they're remaking Blood Gulch.


"no Blood Gulch" could be the title of the Blood Gulch remake. :D

  • 06.02.2009 12:38 PM PDT
  • gamertag:
  • user homepage:
  • last post: 01.01.0001 12:00 AM PDT

Crap so let's see... $60+ for Halo 3, $8 for Heroic, $8 for Legendary, $8 for Mythic, $60 for ODST, and now another $60 for Reach? holy -blam!- and multiply that by the 8.1 million of kids who have bought and will buy all this stuff.

That's roughly $216.24 after 6% sales tax.

x 8.1 million ppl =

$1,751,544,000 One BILLION, seven hundred fifty-one MILLION
, five hundred forty-four THOUSAND dollars.

Think about that for a minute.
I don't see Bungie letting the Halo series just go, do you?

The funny thing is... they make that kind of money from us and headshots still don't count in SWAT. lol

  • 06.02.2009 12:44 PM PDT

You keep using that word. I do not think it means what you think it means.

All I can say to them is "Well played Bungie, well played."



  • 06.02.2009 12:46 PM PDT
  • gamertag:
  • user homepage:
  • last post: 01.01.0001 12:00 AM PDT

i don t understand the halo 3 legendary end it show master chief and cortana going to a planet, they can do another halo with chief and cortana it can be really possible

  • 06.02.2009 12:51 PM PDT

with all this lying bungie has been doing maybe just maybe we will see a remake of blood gulch in reach

  • 06.02.2009 12:53 PM PDT

BannedG33K16
- The BANNED clan
-- Position: Clan Scout and Reconnaissance Expert
-- Clan Mantra: Banned from Losing

I'm assuming Halo 4 would just be Marathon. I think once, a while back they admitted John 117 to be the same security, cyborg John in Marathon, then later retracted the statement. Anyhooters, Bungie had consistently said that Halo 3 was the "end of the story arc". Technically this is true. It's the "end" of the arc. Halo Reach is considered the beginning. It's simple symantics and a play on words. They are a clever bunch.

  • 06.02.2009 12:56 PM PDT

Posted by: chrism312
Posted by: Temp Ultarium
Master Chief was on Reach. Idiot.

But he wasn't known as Master Chief then. He was called John. Idiot.

A couple of things:
-Stop calling eachother idiots.
-He was/is always called john by his fellow spartans in informal situations or by docter halsey . It's his name. Master chief is just a rank.
-First time that he was on reach was as a 6yo boy he didn't have any rank. But that is irralevent considering that the trailer shows that the game is about the fall of reach.
-During the siege/fall of reach he was already promoted to the rank of master chief and he was present during the attack although he didn't go to the planets surface.
- You seem to be under the impression that he was born on Reach. He wasn't.

So you're quite wrong. He already was the "master chief" during the fall of Reach.





[Edited on 06.02.2009 1:09 PM PDT]

  • 06.02.2009 1:08 PM PDT