- waffles pwn
- |
- Exalted Member
Posted by: WestHybrid252
Following up on Halo 3, they already had a malfunctioning ally(Guilty Spark 343). What would be the point of doing that? Besides, its not like the Superintendant has anything to fight with, beside bargaining chips. AND the Superintendant was meant to be a replacement for Cortana during the time you play, to help you. Not kick your ass.
Also, to recap the other theories. And to eliminate others.
Scarab ideas - Not going to work. Scarabs are mini-bosses, not finals.
Hunter ideas- good, but I don't see it going far. Maybe a semi-boss. You know, like in Halo 2, the Heretic Leader. But I wouldn't see that as a final.
Superintendant theory- explained above.
"Dare" Theory- Probably one that would fit. I could imagine fighting Dare, maybe she would have a plasma cannon from a hunter, or duel smgs, I don't care. It would be an interesting fight. And it's not like there isn't a motive. Dare could've been related to the old rebel forces on Harvest(see Halo Wars), or maybe the superintendant and her cut a deal to finish off any other ODST. There are many sub-thories to this, ones that I hope will be continued.
Overall, I vote for the "Dare" Theory.
i agree, though i think it would be fun to play the rampant superintendant
EDIT* ( lol i said play insteada fight ^^^^^^)
[Edited on 06.03.2009 10:39 PM PDT]