- Dream053
- |
- Fabled Legendary Member
- gamertag: [none]
- user homepage:
I do not appreciate B.Net Group solicitation. If you ignore this and send me an invitation anyway, I will block communications with you.
Posted by: PhantomKyro
Really? I didn't know that...Hmmm, but doesn't that mean Microsoft would make that instead? Because Frankie isn't with Bungie anymore...
Not necessarily. It isn't beyond reason for MS to involve members of Microsoft Game Studios in the concept and development process alongside Bungie. It's Micrsoft's IP now, so it would make sense that they'd ensure their own interests with the franchise now as well.
Posted by: pioTROFFski
Posted by: Dream053
Not true. Frankie confirmed at Emerald City that they are not done with the Chief and Cortana's stories.
Yes, but that doesn't mean that these stories have to take place after Halo 3. Halo: Reach deals with the stories of Master Chief and Cortana before the trilogy.
No it doesn't. We have no clue what Halo: Reach will be about. If it's about the original Battle of Reach, chances are we won't see the Chief at all since he very much absent from it in zero-G. If it deals with the Forerunner artifact he was sent in to investigate, then we might, but that's yet to be seen.
Also, it is implied that Frankie was talking about furtherance as it was in response to whether or not the two were actually dead. That, in conjunction with the fact that all of the trilogy's Legendary Endings have always had meaning and led to a subsequent game is more than enough to be plausible.
[Edited on 06.04.2009 4:44 AM PDT]