Halo 3: ODST Forum
This topic has moved here: Subject: Theory: Did Dare controled the Superintendent?
  • Subject: Theory: Did Dare controled the Superintendent?
Subject: Theory: Did Dare controled the Superintendent?

When I was watching the Halo ODST Demo (link). When I was watching it I saw something on the screen when the Rookie let the Superintendent into his system. If you pause at 2:07 it says:
"< < <Superintendent Online> > >"
"> ... <"
"AUTHOR:Dare.V.500341[S1]]"
Thats Dare's service tag! This brings up that she controls (or controled) the Superintendent. This also brings up that Dare's full name is Veronica Dare.

Theory 1:
Dare is a Section One in ONI. Here job is to find out Covenant ship movements and force deployment, evacuation notices for colonies, and deletion of data for secrecy purposes. She probably was sent to protect New Mombasa, this could explain why she change course. She'd probably went to the ONI building and controled the Superident to helped out the squad, and the Rookie.

Theory 2:
This brings up this thread. Did Dare betrayed the squad? If you watch most of the Demo's (link) at the part when Dutch and Mickey are fighting on the bridge, the Superintendent wouldn't let them activate the bombs almost getting them killed. Could this be that the Superintendent (Dare) was trying to kill them? If the Rookie's squad was dead, Dare would of stop controling it. And then she would just leave the system.

[Edited on 06.04.2009 7:40 PM PDT]

  • 06.04.2009 7:39 PM PDT

HACK THE PLANET!

or...Author means Authorization, and the superintendent is using Dares code to access the maps.

  • 06.04.2009 7:41 PM PDT

Posted by: Tactical77
or...Author means Authorization, and the superintendent is using Dares code to access the maps.

It's a theory.

  • 06.04.2009 7:43 PM PDT

i can has cheez its?

Posted by: Tactical77
or...Author means Authorization, and the superintendent is using Dares code to access the maps.
I think this could be possible too, like if Dare was killed while she was logged into a network.

  • 06.04.2009 7:44 PM PDT

i still think this whole mess has to do with Maddie

  • 06.04.2009 7:46 PM PDT

Marine Corps.
Semper Fi.

Posted by: Wikked Navajoe
My problems [with Reach] are basically just full parties, mlg, and people who go out of their way not to get killed.

People are so set against Dare for no reason at all. She is quiet, so what. So was the Master Chief. In fact, Dare says more in the first cutscene than Master Chief does in an entire Halo game.

She has orders and she is ONI. ONI are called "ONI spooks" for a reason people.

I'm going to laugh so hard if Dutch betrays the squad. So many of the Bungie.net community seems to like him the most, so that would be pretty funny.

Yet, why do some people think that someone in the squad is going to betray the rest?

[Edited on 06.04.2009 7:48 PM PDT]

  • 06.04.2009 7:47 PM PDT

Well. If you are a recruiter, too bad, Im not buying. I have a family clan that is exclusive to my kin.
If you are someone else I dont know, I love the AR, playing Campaign, and I hate people who play multiplayer just to show how much better they are than everyone else, especially if they're just camping with the Sniper or Tank.
If you are still reading and dont hate me, then go ahead and message me, you seem to be a "swell guy."

Personally, I think that you guys need to calm down a little. Why throrize when we will find out later? Eh? Your putting way too much energy into something a little patience will solve on its own.

  • 06.04.2009 7:49 PM PDT

Because bungie said in the end the enemy would be a female and people suspect Dare since not much is known about her.

  • 06.04.2009 7:49 PM PDT

Posted by: Viper Skills
People are so set against Dare for no reason at all. She is quiet, so what. So was the Master Chief. In fact, Dare says more in the first cutscene than Master Chief does in an entire Halo game.

She has orders and she is ONI. ONI are called "ONI spooks" for a reason people.

I'm going to laugh so hard if Dutch betrays the squad. So many of the Bungie.net community seems to like him the most, so that would be pretty funny.

Yet, why do some people think that someone in the squad is going to betray the rest?

Dare's like a puzzel, she is the only one in the squad to have no information, this brings up more thories. Just like Master Chief.

  • 06.04.2009 7:51 PM PDT
  • gamertag: Cza4
  • user homepage:

Hacks!...NOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO!!!!!!!

Posted by: family chief
When I was watching the Halo ODST Demo (link). When I was watching it I saw something on the screen when the Rookie let the Superintendent into his system. If you pause at 2:07 it says:
"< < <Superintendent Online> > >"
"> ... <"
"AUTHOR:Dare.V.500341[S1]]"
Thats Dare's service tag! This brings up that she controls (or controled) the Superintendent. This also brings up that Dare's full name is Veronica Dare.

Theory 1:
Dare is a Section One in ONI.

Stop here. S1 doesn't mean Section 1. Could be SPARTAN 1. And this was also a Section 1 project so there.

  • 06.04.2009 7:51 PM PDT

Marine Corps.
Semper Fi.

Posted by: Wikked Navajoe
My problems [with Reach] are basically just full parties, mlg, and people who go out of their way not to get killed.

Posted by: family chief
Posted by: Viper Skills
People are so set against Dare for no reason at all. She is quiet, so what. So was the Master Chief. In fact, Dare says more in the first cutscene than Master Chief does in an entire Halo game.

She has orders and she is ONI. ONI are called "ONI spooks" for a reason people.

I'm going to laugh so hard if Dutch betrays the squad. So many of the Bungie.net community seems to like him the most, so that would be pretty funny.

Yet, why do some people think that someone in the squad is going to betray the rest?

Dare's like a puzzel, she is the only one in the squad to have no information, this brings up more thories. Just like Master Chief.


She is a puzzle because she is ONI. Just because we are not given information about her does it mean she is going to betray the squad? No. But I will admit something is up but it does not mean she is going to snap and put a round in the back of Dutch's domepiece.

  • 06.04.2009 7:53 PM PDT

Posted by: JoshCube
Posted by: family chief
When I was watching the Halo ODST Demo (link). When I was watching it I saw something on the screen when the Rookie let the Superintendent into his system. If you pause at 2:07 it says:
"< < <Superintendent Online> > >"
"> ... <"
"AUTHOR:Dare.V.500341[S1]]"
Thats Dare's service tag! This brings up that she controls (or controled) the Superintendent. This also brings up that Dare's full name is Veronica Dare.

Theory 1:
Dare is a Section One in ONI.

Stop here. S1 doesn't mean Section 1. Could be SPARTAN 1. And this was also a Section 1 project so there.

Bungie said that she wasn't a Spartan 1. And the SPARTAN- I Program was made by Section Two's. Halopedia my friend... Halopedia.

  • 06.04.2009 7:54 PM PDT

Posted by: Viper Skills
Posted by: family chief
Posted by: Viper Skills
People are so set against Dare for no reason at all. She is quiet, so what. So was the Master Chief. In fact, Dare says more in the first cutscene than Master Chief does in an entire Halo game.

She has orders and she is ONI. ONI are called "ONI spooks" for a reason people.

I'm going to laugh so hard if Dutch betrays the squad. So many of the Bungie.net community seems to like him the most, so that would be pretty funny.

Yet, why do some people think that someone in the squad is going to betray the rest?

Dare's like a puzzel, she is the only one in the squad to have no information, this brings up more thories. Just like Master Chief.


She is a puzzle because she is ONI. Just because we are not given information about her does it mean she is going to betray the squad? No. But I will admit something is up but it does not mean she is going to snap and put a round in the back of Dutch's domepiece.

Its a theory, right now all the information that we gathered up points out that it's most likely her. But let time figure it out.

  • 06.04.2009 7:56 PM PDT
  • gamertag: [none]
  • user homepage:

Guys, Guys.... lets blame Stosh

  • 06.04.2009 8:01 PM PDT

perhaps maddie is Dare???

  • 06.04.2009 8:06 PM PDT
  •  | 
  • Exalted Heroic Member

Life is contradictory and ambiguous but it also isn't.

did you thinked this good and hard?
did you learned basic grammars in school?

These question and more will be answer on the next episode of bad grammar on the internet!

To be continued...

  • 06.04.2009 8:08 PM PDT

Posted by: Pit0
did you thinked this good and hard?
did you learned basic grammars in school?

These question and more will be answer on the next episode of bad grammar on the internet!

To be continued...

I don't know who you're talking to but yours isn't great either.

  • 06.04.2009 10:41 PM PDT
  • gamertag:
  • user homepage:
  • last post: 01.01.0001 12:00 AM PDT

Posted by: Mister375
Personally, I think that you guys need to calm down a little. Why throrize when we will find out later? Eh? Your putting way too much energy into something a little patience will solve on its own.
true

  • 06.04.2009 11:09 PM PDT

Drink up baby, stay up all night.
With the things you could do, you won't but you might.
The potential you'll be, but you'll never see.
The promises you'll only make.

Posted by: Anticipation
Because bungie said in the end the enemy would be a female and people suspect Dare since not much is known about her.

Huh? Where?

  • 06.04.2009 11:23 PM PDT

You better close this sig when your done.

Posted by: Al Gore
Guys, Guys.... lets blame Stosh

Go hug a tree.

lol.

Well its only three months, its not like were waiting for halo 3 again. So I think we can wait. :)

  • 06.04.2009 11:31 PM PDT
  • gamertag: Brawke
  • user homepage:

I highy doubt Dare controls Super. That would completely ruin his purpose and the story and we know Bungie doesn't like to ruin their stories. Plus if she needs to get info all she needs to do is ask him. Remember the gamestop video. Most likely Dare hooked up the AI for info like stated above just like the Rookie did.

  • 06.04.2009 11:37 PM PDT