- Reykjavik
- |
- Exalted Legendary Member
We just need to instigate more elitism and Mythic shenanigans.
Posted by: CookieMan
It would be well worth it if you don't have LIVE.
Bungie's actually doing something good for their community with a disadvantage of not being able to play online, and those who do have LIVE come along and bash them for including DLC they already have, solely because they do not think of other people who could benefit from the DLC on disc.I am not bashing them, I am just saying that I don't want to pay for something twice. If it is worth the $60, not including the old maps, then that is great. If not, then a lot of people are going to be pretty angry, myself included. It just doesn't make sense to set it up so you have to pay extra for new content, and it makes me less inclined to buy Bungie products, especially this one. I don't actually know how much value the campaign and firefight will have, or the maps, but I don't want to pay $60 for $40 worth of game + the maps I already have.
Odds are the game is worth it on its own merits, but that doesn't mean it absolutely will be.
Posted by: Mizzou
7he price isn'7 bad a7 all.
$10 for maps
$20 for campaign
$20 for Firefigh7
$5 for unlockable Recon
$5 for Halo: Reach Be7a
7o7al is $60. Wi7h the Collec7or's Edi7ion, you add $40 for a con7roller 7ha7 is wor7h $50 or $60.
for maps, campaign, firefight, and even the reach beta, sure, those are all worth money. But recon armor? you insult me.
I just think that if the game isn't worth it without the DLC that has already been released, and purchased by a lot of players, then they should sell it for what it is worth, and release DLC as a stand alone item.