Halo: Reach Forum
This topic has moved here: Subject: Brutes in Reach Multiplayer????
  • Subject: Brutes in Reach Multiplayer????
  • Pages:
  • 1
  • 2
  • of 2
Subject: Brutes in Reach Multiplayer????
  • gamertag: Ubbers
  • user homepage:

The White Zone is for loading and Unloading only.

I saw that in the ODST gameplay triler that Brutes looked like they had shields. Does this mean that we could see brutes in Reach Multiplayer?

  • 06.05.2009 5:36 PM PDT

Messin with the Squatch

I don't know. I think Bungie is probably going to put them on multiplayer just because people want them so much.

  • 06.05.2009 5:38 PM PDT

Armor Lock isn't overpowered. You just suck at Reach :)

Reach isn't bad, you're just a BK :)

For my gamertag, look up "Ghoulishtie"

No.

  • 06.05.2009 6:10 PM PDT

Mr. 3000

Posted by: IIGhoulishtieII
No.


Please don't ever do this Bungie.

  • 06.05.2009 6:17 PM PDT

Posted by: TrussingDoor
Posted by: DAS B00T x2
You know what's even worse?

When the boy you like has a girlfriend.
#gheyworldproblems

Yes, because then everyone will hate the retarded monkeys and leave us "Dinosaurs" alone

  • 06.05.2009 6:19 PM PDT

HAHA!lol

  • 06.05.2009 6:24 PM PDT

Posted by: Duardo
I'd love to be a 10 year old and tell my mom I'm going on an adventure out into the world catching Pokemon, with her full support. Never mind the fact that there are rapists, criminals, and murders out there, or the fact that I may get killed by a Pokemon.

Luckily I have Pikachu.

Brutes should not be in Halo: Reach due to logic.

  • 06.05.2009 6:33 PM PDT
  • gamertag:
  • user homepage:
  • last post: 01.01.0001 12:00 AM PDT

I don't see any connection between 'ODST' and Reach..

  • 06.05.2009 6:35 PM PDT

"Bungie controls everything. You have no rights. Play nice."

For the last time its TURRETS not TORRENTS. A TORRENT is either a peer to peer file sharing protocol or a violently fast stream of water. A TURRET is a self-contained weapons platform housing guns and capable of rotation. And TURRENT isn't even a word.

Posted by: The BS Police
Brutes should not be in Halo: Reach due to logic.

And what logic would that be? Brutes have been part of the Covenant since Harvest was attacked, they just haven't had a command role. The Elites gave them the worst equipment, the worst posts, and the worst ships. It is entirely possible that you will fight poorly equipped Brutes on Reach. Brute choppers were invented during the harvest conflict. It was originally two spikers welded to the chopper with strings attached to pull the triggers. You might be able to fight against or even drive these primitive choppers on Reach.

I see no reason why Brutes can't be on Reach or in the multiplayer.

  • 06.05.2009 7:15 PM PDT

yes because brutes are huge and would be easy to stick

  • 06.05.2009 7:41 PM PDT

Viva La Revolution!
Social Infection ftw

There should be a Game Mode "Civil War" 1 team is all elites, the other is all brutes.

  • 06.05.2009 7:43 PM PDT
  • gamertag: [none]
  • user homepage:

Recent K/D ratio 2:1

Recent games is either 1st or 2nd place mostly.

Please god no, Brutes were the worste thing to happen to Halo.

  • 06.05.2009 7:44 PM PDT

No thanks. For some reason Bungie doesn't like using two different character models for campaign and multiplayer. So if they remake the Brutes they'll probably mess them up in campaign as well, and we'll end up with 7 foot tall Brutes with big fat heads like the dumb looking fat Elites in Halo 3.

I mean. If they realize they can use slow 10 foot tall Brute's in campaign, and faster 7 foot tall, big head Brutes in multiplayer they might be able to make it work.

  • 06.05.2009 8:51 PM PDT

Were it so easy.

No -blam!- Brutes on Reach!

  • 06.05.2009 8:56 PM PDT

°º¤ø„¸¸„ø¤º° ;¨¸„ø¤º°¨ I Bounce FX I
¨°º¤ø„¸Disturbed „ø¤º°¨
¸„ø¤º°¨ ROCKS!!!! ``°º¤ø„¸
¸„ø¤º°¨¸„ø¤º ;°¨¨°º¤ø„¸¨° ;º¤ø

in multiplayer i hop not because it will prob be another flop like the elite was/is in h2 and h3

but in campagin like stated above would make sence but just they would not be heavily equiped

  • 06.05.2009 8:58 PM PDT
  • gamertag:
  • user homepage:
  • last post: 01.01.0001 12:00 AM PDT

There was no brutes in the books First Strike or The Fall of Reach so, there will NOT be any brutes in Halo: Reach...

Rest assured we are all safe from the monkeys.......

...But video games have changed the story lines of books before. Idk

  • 06.05.2009 9:02 PM PDT

Check Out my FileShare.
I was once on Bungie Faves. (Feb.7-15)
I'd like to know why I can't see the signatures of others of myself on the forum. I have made favs once, 7777 campaign kills, and I helped bring modders down when they were at their strongest

Well I think it is a great idea. I would also like to see ODSTs even though they won't have shields, just to add some variety.

Also, maybe a hidden armor (like Recon) for each kind of unit. Like Panda armor for Brutes or some crap like that

  • 06.05.2009 10:13 PM PDT

brutes + shields does not = brutes in reach

  • 06.05.2009 10:17 PM PDT

Check Out my FileShare.
I was once on Bungie Faves. (Feb.7-15)
I'd like to know why I can't see the signatures of others of myself on the forum. I have made favs once, 7777 campaign kills, and I helped bring modders down when they were at their strongest

Eh I don't think the MP HAS to follow the time the Campaign takes place, Still I would like to see more variety and crap. And maybe the ability to force a player to be a brute or a spartan.

IE. Infection: Humans are Spartans, and when you get infected you turn into your Brute form.

  • 06.05.2009 11:01 PM PDT
  • gamertag:
  • user homepage:
  • last post: 01.01.0001 12:00 AM PDT

Posted by: Arsalan Rehman
Eh I don't think the MP HAS to follow the time the Campaign takes place, Still I would like to see more variety and crap. And maybe the ability to force a player to be a brute or a spartan.

IE. Infection: Humans are Spartans, and when you get infected you turn into your Brute form.



I reckon it would be better if you turned into a flood form for infection. ;)

  • 06.05.2009 11:17 PM PDT

Posted by: The Squatch
I don't know. I think Bungie is probably going to put them on multiplayer just because people want them so much.


ummmm u sure bumped your head when you said that thought huh buddie


cuz last time i checked everybody hates the brutes.... really if you hate elites that much you think brutes are gonna be any better??? lolz

  • 06.05.2009 11:20 PM PDT

Posted by: BSjay
There was no brutes in the books First Strike or The Fall of Reach so, there will NOT be any brutes in Halo: Reach...

Rest assured we are all safe from the monkeys.......

...But video games have changed the story lines of books before. Idk


Actually, there were Brutes in the end of First Strike. They weren't in Reach though. I don't even know how they were in Harvest seeing how it contradicts knowledge of Brutes in First Strike.

And he is talking about multiplayer. Johnson isn't on Earth during ODST, but we get to play as him in Firefight if we preorder the game. Half of the locations in multiplayer aren't even in the game. You don't see Chiron or Guardian locations in Halo campaign, but they are in multiplayer.

[Edited on 06.05.2009 11:24 PM PDT]

  • 06.05.2009 11:22 PM PDT

elites are heaps better than brutes :]

  • 06.05.2009 11:39 PM PDT
  •  | 
  • Exalted Legendary Member

Maybe they will let us play matches that force you to play as a specific race. I think a Grunt playlist would be fun.

  • 06.06.2009 12:02 AM PDT

  • Pages:
  • 1
  • 2
  • of 2