- last post: 01.01.0001 12:00 AM PDT
Posted by: pumpkin1
Posted by: techfreak1
Posted by: pumpkin1
Posted by: techfreak1
Posted by: pumpkin1
Agree with this thread, except the BR reticule.
what's wrong with reducing the size of the battle rifle's aiming reticle?
I think making the AR more versatile would do the job, and I think BRs are really fun to use because they require skill. Reducing the reticule will still require skill, but I guess its just less fun. Idk.
the main reason for reducing the size of the reticule is to make the battle rifle more difficult to use at close and medium ranges. That way the battle rifle is less of god weapon.
Maybe, but it already looses to the assault rifle in close quarters.
But it seemly never loses at med range. It's effective range should be limited to long range.