- X206
- |
- Exalted Heroic Member
Historia magistra vitae est
Posted by: SnakeRunner40
Why do we keep saying Bungie would, Bungie wouldn't? MICROSOFT OWNS HALO, NOT BUNGIE. /facepalm.
Microsoft may own the Halo brand, but as you may be able to tell from the fact that you are posting on Bungie.net, Halo: Reach is being developed by Bungie. Microsoft have had the good sense to let Bungie do as they wish with the franchise.
I'm standing in the 'It's a prequel' crowd. The blue sun, the Forerunner glyphs, and the 'Bungie hate time travel plot' facts prove it. Apart from the blue glow around the Legendary Ending planet being similiar to the one in the Reach trailer, I can't see any proof to the contrary.
And for my two cents, I personally wouldn't like the whole 'Chief goes back in time and changes the last three games' scenario. Haloe CE - Halo 3 were great games, so why write them out of canon? I do, however, like the prospect of experiencing the Fall of Reach.