Halo: Reach Forum
This topic has moved here: Subject: There was no Brutes on Reach.
  • Subject: There was no Brutes on Reach.
Subject: There was no Brutes on Reach.

Right?
So There aren't that many enemy types that can be in the game?

  • 06.07.2009 5:03 AM PDT

I think its elites again

  • 06.07.2009 5:06 AM PDT

yay! I love Elites!

  • 06.07.2009 5:13 AM PDT

but this would mean this game has less enemies than halo 3
unless...

  • 06.07.2009 5:15 AM PDT

unless flood come? i want gravemind

  • 06.07.2009 5:19 AM PDT

Shane: Hey Flake can you sign this for me?
*Flake leans against table to sign shirt*
Random: Hey Christoph can you sign this for me?
*Christoph leans against Flake to sign shirt*

Best moment of my life ^.^
Rammstein backstage - Big day out 2011

The covenant engineers! I will finally be able to slaughter them in halo!
.... >:)

  • 06.07.2009 5:22 AM PDT

Rule 6: Respect the Admins

“It’s their website, and they can do whatever the hell they like with it. You’re a guest, and hassling them about how they run things is akin to going round your Auntie’s house and curling one out in her tea-pot.”

You're right. In the book Fall of reach the majority in charge was the elites with few refferences to brutes.

  • 06.07.2009 5:25 AM PDT

Rule 6: Respect the Admins

“It’s their website, and they can do whatever the hell they like with it. You’re a guest, and hassling them about how they run things is akin to going round your Auntie’s house and curling one out in her tea-pot.”

Posted by: xZcNx MarcWagz
but this would mean this game has less enemies than halo 3
unless...


Wrong the reason reach fell was because close to 300 covenate warships attacked it. The massive orbital MAC cannons are beast.

there should be MORE covenate then halo 3. But balancing must be considered.

[Edited on 06.07.2009 5:42 AM PDT]

  • 06.07.2009 5:27 AM PDT