Halo: Reach Forum
This topic has moved here: Subject: how violent should halo: reach, be?
  • Subject: how violent should halo: reach, be?
Subject: how violent should halo: reach, be?
  • gamertag: [none]
  • user homepage:

ive always thought that halo CE-3 were never violent enough, i mean lik, sometimes when your playing on legendary and you keep being killed and when you finally get past this one part, it isnt very satisfying, id like to see way more blood and like being able to pick up grunts and throw them about or blow limbs off and stuff.
take gears of war for e.g. i felt it was soo satisfying blowing the locust to pieces lol

but even so without the violence all halos have always been my favourite games without a shadow of a doubt.

  • 06.08.2009 3:34 AM PDT

TaCo FLavORed KiSsEs

So play gears of war. Bungie isn't going to change the feel of Halo just because you think they should. And gore is really unnecessary

  • 06.08.2009 3:37 AM PDT
  • gamertag: [none]
  • user homepage:

This isn't Gears of War, I don't want to be ripping grunts in two with a blade.

However, bring back the puddles of covenant blood from CE, that was awesome.

  • 06.08.2009 3:39 AM PDT
  • gamertag: [none]
  • user homepage:

yea, but the thing is... gears of war is nothing like halo, its not good enough..

i was just thinking maybe the could do something to make halo just a bit more fun to play

  • 06.08.2009 3:39 AM PDT
  • gamertag: [none]
  • user homepage:

not with a blade, but with the chief bare hands! haha

lol yea i use to hit the covenant for ages and what the ton of colorful blood fly everywhere in CE

  • 06.08.2009 3:41 AM PDT

Your Friendly Neighborhood Spider-Pope

If the amount of gore in a game determines how much fun it is for you, then you have some disturbing issues.

Excess Gore does not = extra fun. Halo is fine the way it is.

  • 06.08.2009 3:54 AM PDT