Halo: Reach Forum
This topic has moved here: Subject: who thinks we might finally see the fate of MC in an ending?
  • Subject: who thinks we might finally see the fate of MC in an ending?
Subject: who thinks we might finally see the fate of MC in an ending?

Yes, really

who thinks we might get to see what happened to MC/ what planet that was in the legendary ending.etc in the legendary ending of HR? i hope we do

  • 06.09.2009 1:24 PM PDT

Signatures are for squares.

ITS A PREQUEL. HOLY BALLS.

  • 06.09.2009 1:24 PM PDT

OW

MASTER CHIEF IS NOT GOING BACK IN TIME. IT'S A PREQUEL.

  • 06.09.2009 1:25 PM PDT

I have the best signature ever, it's just on break at the moment.

LOLOLOL PREQUEL!

  • 06.09.2009 1:25 PM PDT

Yes, really

i know its a prequel. that doesnt mean the cant do a little scene after the ending back in 2552 or when ever chief goes to that planet.

\/\/\/\/ ive read the books. except for the Cole protocol. haven't gotten around to it

[Edited on 06.09.2009 1:28 PM PDT]

  • 06.09.2009 1:26 PM PDT

I have the best signature ever, it's just on break at the moment.

People learn how to read! By that I mean read the BOOKS! There REALLY GOOD! Also, they don'ts makes yOurZ braIAnzz HurtStezz!

  • 06.09.2009 1:27 PM PDT

OW

NO. THERE IS NO CHIEF. i haven't read the book, so there MIGHT be a younger master chief. but i highly disagree with time travel

  • 06.09.2009 1:27 PM PDT

I have the best signature ever, it's just on break at the moment.

Dude Chief lives through ALOT MORE AFTER REACH! I mean ALOOOT!

  • 06.09.2009 1:28 PM PDT
  • gamertag: [none]
  • user homepage:

I am 1337

Posted by: tkdsailor177
LOLOLOL PREQUEL!

Posted by: tkdsailor177
LOLOLOL PREQUEL!

Posted by: tkdsailor177
LOLOLOL PREQUEL!

What he said lol

  • 06.09.2009 1:28 PM PDT

By the power of truth, I, while living, have conquered the universe.

Yeah, I'll 100% bet that the Dawn is actually the TARDIS and wen't back in time so John could -blam!- up Halo for all eternity!
/Sarcasm

Honestly, I am not sitting around for the next 500+ days reading the same topic over and over and over again. I'm so sick of this, I feel like kicking a dog!
Get this into your thick heads okay:

HALO: REACH IS A PREQUEL. IT TAKES PLACE BEFORE HALO 1. BUNGIE CONFIRMED THAT. SHUT UP.

  • 06.09.2009 1:28 PM PDT

His fate is that he is drifting towards a planet while Cortana activates a beacon which will hopefully lead to his rescue. That's how the Halo story arch ends, bringing the Master Chief full circle. Halo:CE began with him in the cryotube and ends with him in a cryotube. The only way Bungie could possibly explain further aspects of his fate is if that planet during the Legendary ending was Reach.

  • 06.09.2009 1:28 PM PDT

Yes, really

Posted by: ajw34307

HALO: REACH IS A PREQUEL. IT TAKES PLACE BEFORE HALO 1. BUNGIE CONFIRMED THAT. SHUT UP.

i no that. chill out

  • 06.09.2009 1:30 PM PDT

By the power of truth, I, while living, have conquered the universe.

Posted by: HopliteKai
His fate is that he is drifting towards a planet while Cortana activates a beacon which will hopefully lead to his rescue. That's how the Halo story arch ends, bringing the Master Chief full circle. Halo:CE began with him in the cryotube and ends with him in a cryotube. The only way Bungie could possibly explain further aspects of his fate is if that planet during the Legendary ending was Reach.


Which would render everything else before those events, worthless. And Bungie definately aren't going to screw up their own canon.


i no that. chill out


I'm not talking to you, I'm talking to every idiot who thinks that Reach involves time-travel.

[Edited on 06.09.2009 1:32 PM PDT]

  • 06.09.2009 1:31 PM PDT

I have the best signature ever, it's just on break at the moment.

AcctualyZZ Da chief assplodes and gets died, which makes him have a mini me of himselves which is the chief we play only wearing stilts insde of the suit. BUNGIE WILL FINALY RELEASE THE TRUTH!

I purposly typed like a five year old so that others with a five year old attention span would understand.

[Edited on 06.09.2009 1:33 PM PDT]

  • 06.09.2009 1:31 PM PDT