- SmokinGiant01
- |
- Exalted Legendary Member
Posted by: B3N031292
ok to point out why the new fire fight looks better than hord is because halo you have a crouch button for when you want to sneak, also FF has randomly generated rounds silly. other than that i know ur pointing out the similarities they both have but the differences are what makes FF better. another few points as to why halo is better in FF is because not only are there random rounds but you have to deal with the challenge of skulls being turned on, with this in mind compaired to gears hord (and -blam!- zombie in call of duty) the game is new increasing the want for more features and difficuly.
and with my spelling yeah we all make mistakes just like how u have miss inturpreted the word relevance with realization lol. there for you comment b4 is now invalid.
i re-edited this to confim i wasnt calling anyone the german word
but besides that, add me because u seem very interested in the differances between games
Posted by: SmokinGiant01
Posted by: B3N031292
yeah but gears is shiz... lol they didnt even make a crouch button. but yeah ive quite enjoyed all of the metal gears... i think its cos ur a bad gamer hmmm??? and if you have a good thing why not keep it runnen. its like super smash bros on 64 twas the best game ever for its time but was constantly being modded to become better now we have melee and brawl. but back on subject fire fight is cool because u can actually fight, in gears all you could do was vrs the same 10 hords over and over and over and over again like sero that is boaring for 50 rounds.You are calling me a bad gamer? I don't see what realization that has to anything. If you are bringing something as petty as that up, then I think I am well within bonds to say that you have very poor spelling.
Gears was praised for the grittiness and new game play; I still think it sucks. As for firefight, you really said nothing to justify your point as to why it would be better or more intuitive, over Gears' Horde mode. You tried to justiy by pointing out the same thing Horde does, and them calling them negative thing.
"10 hords over and over and over and over again like sero that is boaring for 50 rounds."
What do you think firefight will be, there will be less weapons and less enemies as well.With the addition of skulls only add to the difficulty, more than just the Halo series use the crouch to sneak, and random rounds isn't impressive.
As for your point about my spelling, if you must know I meant relevance and I use Firefox's spell check. One more thing is that it's early, so I am letting that goes as a typo.
You still have yet to tell me why being a good or bad gamer has any relevance to my point.
Posted by: ze cushion
@ the OP of the topic.
You don't have to buy it if you don't want to. That's your choice. Meanwhile, the rest of us are gonna go kick some Covenant butt come September 22nd.
This game brings some good changes, from an open world environment to the firefight mode, it's worth its price tag. I wouldn't consider Halo being "milked" just yet, as I usually consider a franchise to be milked when it's doing badly. But so far, every Halo game has been awesome, even Halo Wars, although not as awesome as the shooters, still good. So why stop? Why stop making a title that sells successfully every time it has a new release? Why stop making superb games that people will play for years to come?
Like it or not, Halo isn't even close to over yet. Like somebody said in this topic, it's got so much backstory to cover, and the fact that Bungie is showing fans what went on in Mombassa during the events leading up to Halo 3 is awesome, because that's what we wanted.Honestly, saying to not buy the game is a cop out. Halo CE was by far the best, but with the addition of Halo 2 and 3 I would have to say that are mediocre in terms of the story.
I don't ever remember any fans asking for Bungie to cover that, in fact I think that too is a cop out to make more money. The only thing we wanted was to have some closure as to where the Chief was, and they give us a whole new campaign that will only give us more questions.
As for the open world environment, it has been done to death since GTA Vice city. Way to think outside the box Bungie, add open world with FPS, no one has ever done that before. Just because there is a lot of titles in a series, doesn't mean it has to be doing bad to be milked. All it has to be doing is to use the title to get some money; perfect example is Star Wars.
OSDT would have been awesome to come as DLC or a new game after Halo 2, to change it up from not being the Master Chief, but now it seems a little to late to have it now.
[Edited on 06.10.2009 3:10 AM PDT]