Halo: Reach Forum
This topic has moved here: Poll [15 votes]: Should all the maps be based on reach or have halo ring maps?
  • Poll [15 votes]: Should all the maps be based on reach or have halo ring maps?
Subject: Reach Multiplayer Maps?

Five years older and wiser
The fires are burning, I'm fire, never tire
Slay warriors in the forests, and on hire

Poll: Should all the maps be based on reach or have halo ring maps?  [closed]
Only Reach Maps:  40%
(6 Votes)
Both Halo & Reach Maps:  27%
(4 Votes)
Just Halo Maps:  7%
(1 Votes)
I Dont Care:  27%
(4 Votes)
Total Votes: 15

Since Theres No Halo Rings in this game.
Should all the maps be Earth/Reach based e.g Millitary Installments, towns and landscape?

  • 06.10.2009 2:28 AM PDT
  • gamertag:
  • user homepage:
  • last post: 01.01.0001 12:00 AM PDT

Reach has enough varied topography to supply a whole new set of maps.If bungie wants to make remakes of Halo maps,they can just be made in Reach locales.No one will be able to tell the difference.I know what you are thinking,there can't be any covenant or forerunner constructs because Reach is a human planet.If you read First Strike,you know that Reach has Forerunner roots,possibly inhabited by forerunners at one point even.The covenant attacked Reach in search of a Forerunner artifact.Maps could be developed (wether under the pretense of or actually being echoed in the game) as having Forerunner architecture that was just unearthed,perhaps by plasma bombardment.The maps could also incorporate on the spot covenant architecture,makeshift bases erected to hold covenant lines and branch troops and support from.

  • 06.10.2009 1:25 PM PDT