Posted by: UntouchedNic
people shouldnt just dismiss this idea striaght away, sure, it is a load of ----- but thats not the point.
the point is, that this person has thought about it, and given a valid theory, which might have been accepted if we didnt know where/when it was set.
Dis any of you know that the SPARTANS didnt always have MJOLNIR armor??? didnt think so...
No, it isn't a valid theory. There are so many obvious reasons why it isn't.
And yes, I "dis" know that. I'm guessing you just looked up a bit on the wiki.
I know that everyone says "Spartans" as in the Spartans from the SPARTAN-II project like Master Chief, but what about the Spartans from the SPARTAN-III project, they we're volunteers. They we're turned into super soldiers and had armour that wasn't nearly as good as the MJOLNIR armour.
If you want to prove a theory, learn a little on what you are trying to prove.
The SIIIs were recruited without a choice, since they had to keep it secret.
They were recruited when they were still children, they fought when they were 12. By ODST there are no new SIIIs being made, so even if they violated every part of the Spartan programme, they wouldn't make him into one.
The reason the Spartans are picked so specifically, is because certain genetical markers would increase their chance of living through the augmentation. It is unlikely the Rookie is one of those people, so he would be in a high-risk, expensive procedure.
The SPI armour still required the wearer to have the Spartan augmentations. They can't just put anyone in the suit, or they will break their bones once they move.