Halo: Reach Forum
This topic has moved here: Subject: My theory for Reach
  • Subject: My theory for Reach
Subject: My theory for Reach

Who says that we HAVE to play on the UNSC side? There's no point in doubting that the game will mimic the book. What if you're playing as the Elite who becomes the Arbiter in Halo 2 (can't remember his name) who leads the attack on Reach in the book? Just seems kind of pointless to me to play any portion of the UNSC side if you're just going to fail/die in the end.

  • 06.11.2009 9:42 AM PDT

I am a living Halo encyclopedia!

You're basing your theory off of a misguided conception that you can actually "win" at every game.



Play more DOOM.

[Edited on 06.11.2009 9:49 AM PDT]

  • 06.11.2009 9:49 AM PDT
  •  | 
  • Elder Mythic Member

The Covenant fail at the end of Halo 3. What's the difference?

Also, there are Spartans in the damn banner. Why would they be there if you play as Covies?

  • 06.11.2009 9:49 AM PDT

Posted by: Sabe

Also, there are Spartans in the damn banner. Why would they be there if you play as Covies?


It's obvious MC isn't one of those Spartans, yet there are countless threads on this forum about how MC time travels back in time to fight on Reach. How is this any less plausable?

  • 06.11.2009 10:04 AM PDT
  •  | 
  • Elder Mythic Member

Why is it obvious? MC was at Reach when it fell, just not on the surface.

The one in the middle of the banner looks suspiciously like MC to me. The time travel theories are all as flimsy as this sorry excuse for an idea.

  • 06.11.2009 10:11 AM PDT
  • gamertag:
  • user homepage:
  • last post: 01.01.0001 12:00 AM PDT

what are u guys talking about, its getting confusing.

  • 06.11.2009 10:39 AM PDT