Halo: Reach Forum
This topic has moved here: Subject: Possibly add something like this to Reach's matchmaking....
  • Subject: Possibly add something like this to Reach's matchmaking....
Subject: Possibly add something like this to Reach's matchmaking....

Challenge me to a Hawaiian Punch chugging contest. I dare you.


Posted by: mubox47
$.50 in store credit.

...if it has one.

Okay, not many people are happy with the true skill system, so i was wondering if something like this could be added.

Rearrange teams so they are more even. Last night, a game of SWAT went something like this.

Red Team
17
35
12
40

Blue Team
12
10
35 <----- Me.
7

Why not have a system so that they are rearranges so both teams have a closer numerical total skill?

i.e

Red 81
40
12
12
17
Blue 87
35
35
10
7

That just seems like it could be a little more fair. Of course, this is not as simple as it seems. Bungie would have to make a lot of changes to whatever system they use now. This is just a suggestion.

[Edited on 06.11.2009 1:48 PM PDT]

  • 06.11.2009 1:21 PM PDT

hmmm....

you know 35 and 35 is already 70 right?

  • 06.11.2009 1:26 PM PDT

Challenge me to a Hawaiian Punch chugging contest. I dare you.


Posted by: mubox47
$.50 in store credit.

Posted by: Icy Dark Moon 13
hmmm....

you know 35 and 35 is already 70 right?
Ohhhhhhhh, i knew i should have double checked with a calculator. 1 sec.

  • 06.11.2009 1:32 PM PDT
  • gamertag: L0RCH
  • user homepage:

I kinda agree, BUT:

You play with kids on lvl 7 because they are in a party with some one on your skill.
So for your system to work you would need to seperate parties and that's a really anoying thing.
Bionic Commando does that and it just sucks.

I'd prefer something like you can't play with kids that are more then 30 levels under you.
That way you wouldn't have to play with kids on level 6 when you are on 40.

  • 06.11.2009 1:33 PM PDT

Challenge me to a Hawaiian Punch chugging contest. I dare you.


Posted by: mubox47
$.50 in store credit.

Meh, ill fix math later. You get the point though. Another thing, is maybe use global rank instead of rank for each playlist. Sure, we were all between 6-20 in SWAT, but in global we were between 7 and 40.

  • 06.11.2009 1:36 PM PDT