Halo: Reach Forum
This topic has moved here: Poll [56 votes]: Is Halo: Reach set after Halo 3? (Read my post first)
  • Poll [56 votes]: Is Halo: Reach set after Halo 3? (Read my post first)
  • Pages:
  • 1
  • 2
  • of 2
Subject: Halo: Reach is set after Halo 3?
  • gamertag:
  • user homepage:
  • last post: 01.01.0001 12:00 AM PDT

Poll: Is Halo: Reach set after Halo 3? (Read my post first)  [closed]
Yes:  4%
(2 Votes)
No:  88%
(49 Votes)
Maybe:  9%
(5 Votes)
Total Votes: 56

I'm not sure if this is true but wasn't the Arbiter with the Covenant before Halo 3?

If he was on the Covenent side before Halo 3 wouldn't that mean Halo: Reach is set after Halo 3 because on the Halo: Reach photo it shows the Arbiter (far left), Master Chief (middle), and some Marines / ODSTs which means the Arbiter is with the humans which means Halo: Reach is set after Halo 3.

Agree with me?

Edit: This might not be about the book and it might be about something new happening to the planet. It might not even be based on the Planet Reach. Bungie hasnt confirmed anything yet so you never know.

****READ THIS****

Guys im sorry I have never read the books or anything so stop getting angry at me

[Edited on 06.11.2009 7:33 PM PDT]

  • 06.11.2009 6:00 PM PDT

Blend in with the indigenous life, analyze their weaknesses, prepare the planet for the coming badness! Yay.

fail thread

  • 06.11.2009 6:03 PM PDT

Yes, really

its a confirmed prequel. check xbox.com

/thread

  • 06.11.2009 6:03 PM PDT
  • gamertag: [none]
  • user homepage:

Tall thing is Sam a Spartan III or II

  • 06.11.2009 6:04 PM PDT

not Pikesmaker

lololololololololololololololololololol

  • 06.11.2009 6:05 PM PDT
  • gamertag:
  • user homepage:
  • last post: 01.01.0001 12:00 AM PDT

I might prove you all wrong someday so keep laughin

  • 06.11.2009 6:08 PM PDT
  • gamertag: [none]
  • user homepage:

It is possible but unlikely Reach was destroyed WEEKS before Halo 1! Yeah H1. And ugh...the title...giveaway. Plus they're not adding anymore games that are to follow up H3. Srry but ugh...we might as well...ugh...laugh? Oh and when does he arby hold HUMAN weapons look closely its some new turret, or machine gun.

[Edited on 06.11.2009 6:12 PM PDT]

  • 06.11.2009 6:10 PM PDT

Loyalty is all I have.

it's a prequel, if it wasn't then it would be called Halo 4

  • 06.11.2009 6:12 PM PDT

Break the rules,
Stand apart,
Ignore your head,
And follow your heart

-Unknown

Sam died on his first mission wen MC and him were 14

  • 06.11.2009 6:12 PM PDT

not Pikesmaker

Posted by: Nicdog
I might prove you all wrong someday so keep laughin

I'm laughing at you because you think the Arbiter is in the picture.

  • 06.11.2009 6:12 PM PDT

not Pikesmaker

Posted by: MasterLemonMan
It is possible but unlikely Reach was destroyed WEEKS before Halo 1! Yeah H1. And ugh...the title...giveaway. Plus they're not adding anymore games that are to follow up H3. Srry but ugh...we might as well...ugh...laugh? Oh and when does he arby hold HUMAN weapons look closely its some new turret, or machine gun.

and lol @ you because the Arbiter holds human weapons in the cutscene between Floodgate and The Ark in H3.

  • 06.11.2009 6:14 PM PDT
  • gamertag: [none]
  • user homepage:

If thats Arby he's holding a Human weapon and maybe they went back in time to Reach. lol

  • 06.11.2009 6:14 PM PDT
  • gamertag: [none]
  • user homepage:

Posted by: Pikesmakker VI
Posted by: MasterLemonMan
It is possible but unlikely Reach was destroyed WEEKS before Halo 1! Yeah H1. And ugh...the title...giveaway. Plus they're not adding anymore games that are to follow up H3. Srry but ugh...we might as well...ugh...laugh? Oh and when does he arby hold HUMAN weapons look closely its some new turret, or machine gun.

and lol @ you because the Arbiter holds human weapons in the cutscene between Floodgate and The Ark in H3.
Actually thats because of Multiplayer and even if he still holds Human weapons explain Reach.

  • 06.11.2009 6:15 PM PDT

Posted by: Nicdog
I might prove you all wrong someday so keep laughin


The fall of reach happened before Halo 1 so . . . if reach is being glassed in the teaser then explain to me how this is a sequel ?


PS - HaHaHaHaHaHaHaHa

  • 06.11.2009 6:17 PM PDT

Loyalty is all I have.

come to think of it, don't Elites have reverse legs? The big guy in the pic has regualr ones.

  • 06.11.2009 6:19 PM PDT

not Pikesmaker

Posted by: MasterLemonMan
Posted by: Pikesmakker VI
Posted by: MasterLemonMan
It is possible but unlikely Reach was destroyed WEEKS before Halo 1! Yeah H1. And ugh...the title...giveaway. Plus they're not adding anymore games that are to follow up H3. Srry but ugh...we might as well...ugh...laugh? Oh and when does he arby hold HUMAN weapons look closely its some new turret, or machine gun.

and lol @ you because the Arbiter holds human weapons in the cutscene between Floodgate and The Ark in H3.
Actually thats because of Multiplayer and even if he still holds Human weapons explain Reach.

Nothing I said had anything to do with multiplayer.

  • 06.11.2009 6:21 PM PDT

Elites go forward like a normal person then back weird legs

[Edited on 06.11.2009 6:22 PM PDT]

  • 06.11.2009 6:21 PM PDT
  • gamertag: [none]
  • user homepage:

CO-OP What ever weapon you hold appears in the cutscene try it out.

  • 06.11.2009 6:23 PM PDT

Posted by: Nicdog
I might prove you all wrong someday so keep laughin


HAHAHAHAHAHA REACH was destroyed before halo 1 why would this game be set after halo 3?!?!?! hahahahaa

  • 06.11.2009 6:23 PM PDT

Posted by: BLUEelite52
Posted by: Nicdog
I might prove you all wrong someday so keep laughin


HAHAHAHAHAHA REACH was destroyed before halo 1 why would this game be set after halo 3?!?!?! hahahahaa
The OP is a little slow

  • 06.11.2009 6:25 PM PDT

"I'm not sure if this is true but wasn't the Arbiter with the Covenant before Halo 3?
If he was on the Covenent side before Halo 3 wouldn't that mean Halo: Reach is set after Halo 3"

lol OP read this and tell me how this could make any sence.

[Edited on 06.11.2009 6:29 PM PDT]

  • 06.11.2009 6:28 PM PDT
  • gamertag: [none]
  • user homepage:

Posted by: BLUEelite52
"I'm not sure if this is true but wasn't the Arbiter with the Covenant before Halo 3?
If he was on the Covenent side before Halo 3 wouldn't that mean Halo: Reach is set after Halo 3"

lol OP read this and tell me how this could make any sence.

A. He thinks Arbiter is in teh pic

  • 06.11.2009 6:31 PM PDT

Tell me how that looks like the arbiter . . . . .

http://img200.imageshack.us/img200/749/figuresbolder.jpg

  • 06.11.2009 6:38 PM PDT
  • gamertag:
  • user homepage:
  • last post: 01.01.0001 12:00 AM PDT

if you ask me, he looks like hes wearing EOD shoulders.
maybe a explosive disposal unit?

  • 06.11.2009 6:43 PM PDT
  • gamertag: [none]
  • user homepage:

Yea and it cant be an elite because dont they have tails.

  • 06.11.2009 6:49 PM PDT

  • Pages:
  • 1
  • 2
  • of 2