Halo: Reach Forum
This topic has moved here: Poll [18 votes]: If you Agree
  • Poll [18 votes]: If you Agree
Subject: If you Agree
  • gamertag:
  • user homepage:
  • last post: 01.01.0001 12:00 AM PDT

Poll: If you Agree  [closed]
Yes:  83%
(15 Votes)
No:  17%
(3 Votes)
Total Votes: 18

i think in halo reach they should make bots. so for people who do not have live or their live runs out will still have a multiplayer experience. also if they were to do that i think they should make it ranked and social bots too. idk about yall but that would be cool playin btb or griffball in social with bots also i think they should make downloadable armour after a while :)

  • 06.11.2009 6:49 PM PDT

-BRW

I would suggest using them only when someone quits...if a teammate quits then replace them with a bot to keep things even!

  • 06.11.2009 7:07 PM PDT

Could not agree with The Big Red 01 any more....great idea.

  • 06.11.2009 7:13 PM PDT
  • gamertag: Zepode
  • user homepage:

"From whence shall we expect the approach of danger? Shall some trans-Atlantic military giant step the earth and crush us at a blow? Never. All the armies of Europe and Asia...could not by force take a drink from the Ohio River or make a track on the Blue Ridge in the trial of a thousand years. No, if destruction be our lot we must ourselves be its author and finisher. As a nation of free men we will live forever or die by suicide." - Abraham Lincoln

Not a bad idea... in theory.

I'm not sure the logistics are there, though. It seems to me like it would be too much work for a small audience.

I'd rather that they just concentrated on making the best game possible for the most people who really care (aka, people w/ Live)

  • 06.11.2009 7:19 PM PDT
  •  | 
  • Fabled Legendary Member

Posted by: r c takedown
Yax is a shining beacon in these dark times. You should all strive to be more like Yax.

That would be unbelievably awesome and would most likely double the games longevity. Like already said it would be great to fix unbalanced MM games too.

Posted by: Zepode
Not a bad idea... in theory.

I'm not sure the logistics are there, though. It seems to me like it would be too much work for a small audience.

I'd rather that they just concentrated on making the best game possible for the most people who really care (aka, people w/ Live)
Any statistics to back up what you are saying? I expect you'd be surprised at the amount of people without LIVE, also, asking Bungie to play favourites? Shame on you.

[Edited on 06.11.2009 7:29 PM PDT]

  • 06.11.2009 7:21 PM PDT
  • gamertag:
  • user homepage:
  • last post: 01.01.0001 12:00 AM PDT

not replacing in MM.in Customs because MM is laggy and -blam!- and for people with out Xbox live2

  • 07.18.2009 2:39 PM PDT
  •  | 
  • Veteran Legendary Member

I disagree, bots could be a huge annoyance.

  • 07.18.2009 2:41 PM PDT

Big Team Battle Multiflag/Slayer on Standoff/Valhalla/Sandtrap/Avalanche = Win

Posted by: The Big Red 01
I would suggest using them only when someone quits...if a teammate quits then replace them with a bot to keep things even!


Not really, imagine a game of SWAT, and 2 people quit, instead of it being 2v4, there will be some bot replacements, and they'll either help destroy the other team... which will soon lead to forum topics regarding Bots and how they're "Too accurate" or "Too hard"

OR

The bots will be really easy, and the team of Four will actually get kills faster then the team of two.

Bots should only be used in Custom Games, or maybe a few rumble pit games even.

Like Juggernaut except after you kill the bot and become the Juggernaut, the bot doesn't respawn.

  • 07.18.2009 3:28 PM PDT